Delivery-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 01:32:19 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD0F1E04E0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 21 May 2015 01:32:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AA834279;
	Thu, 21 May 2015 05:32:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C6B34279
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 21 May 2015 05:32:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id XuJXh2wzLgZT for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 21 May 2015 05:32:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6832534171
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 21 May 2015 05:32:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so1636802igb.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 22:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=jlQjjLIu8tC8DCvKi0glFujKlGFZRPvzTgWBgu5mrT0=;
 b=Kx75Px7HCygbc9e8zQxLf3rQB3R7SM8fJszCq0PNhwTEFHBwgMqy/ty82XXZj6JQMl
 mQXQYo8XPDH0ygSEcMt4pARSdGft5GJ7gpRarFrrGXAH8P1RPpUfaMHP1gYIGwCZg+oz
 v5eJ/scUgmafK+E8boEpsyUmS5Z3VZZSAR9z2SzI9ZIF2EzgV6rQwzJvE/eH7e+MIIL2
 jOM2Jl8k3x0bp8hBtyufMN6HEN6EAvPJo06WSDlkXqA4RHKHjlN2v6CaFBpOGAj5PdIU
 VGjIlevj0pPYxDaX6nEGAKWFY9L3SFm2dyOXKwb5IUKULygslX/p8FPLUm0uJRgbbosw
 M6bA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.141.164 with SMTP id rp4mr10287848igb.2.1432186326057;
 Wed, 20 May 2015 22:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.51.76 with HTTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 22:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <378b143198fd622b50837788360dc0dd.squirrel@sdfeu.org>
References: <mailman.349.1432097134.2716.tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 <378b143198fd622b50837788360dc0dd.squirrel@sdfeu.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 01:32:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2-wOD9b62AjspD=FZga8mv0KWf7BLbm3f-dJB-18PvaCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Use of TOR [sic] for illegal activities
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Paul A. Crable <paul@crable.us> wrote:
> I'd support censorship if I was in charge of it

You won't be.

> but I doubt most others would go along with my idea.

No one here will be either. As you've discovered, it's
non negotiable.

> So I guess we must leave things as they are, flawed
> as they may be.

The only flaws here are the censors, and we're tired of leaving
them be as they were.

> I think they'd be surprised it is being used today.

Did you know there are hidden service forums for worshippers of SATAN?
And ones for atheists, muslims and the FSM? And for Christians?

By the way, theaters of today are built such that they don't burn
in a way that would threaten the lives of rational moviegoers.
The irrational ones are like censors, they are the ones
that stampede and kill people.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

