Delivery-Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 18:15:49 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5D41E0BBD
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sun, 17 May 2015 18:15:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970B135308;
	Sun, 17 May 2015 22:15:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D08735304
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 17 May 2015 22:15:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id OWzQP6_7acY3 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 17 May 2015 22:15:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bitmessage.ch (mail.bitmessage.ch [146.228.112.252])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C95A93529A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 17 May 2015 22:15:38 +0000 (UTC)
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail;
 c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=Ka2DVtXnhdhNcWwwRVWysSapU2JlT0Ctq/E8LcDcgaI=;
 b=cwT8zgWrFzBYYmjpPjy9/s5wuZCHZl3tjJIfI2xtcE0MWJ5eabOwLrF+L+wyVkgZZMMuyOlgc/FvtRvkPY1nqLCtLqCSA43APqNeLWn0Fh4xlLl72sBTCPO4LS1oG0SZ1DSzVF2wmRjCf5iItZza03EkjfY3VS1DFWRMTAXpvUo=
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (BITMESSAGE [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.bitmessage.ch with ESMTPSA
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128)
 ; Wed, 6 May 2015 14:48:17 +0200
Message-ID: <554A0D94.3090007@bitmessage.ch>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 12:48:20 +0000
From: Tempest <tempest@bitmessage.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <5548D4B4.9040303@rwth-aachen.de>
 <20150505155135.GD7800@moria.seul.org>
 <20150505163624.5D57FE04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
 <5548F685.2090704@openmailbox.org>
 <20150505170747.61F8BE04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
 <55490663.3070407@openmailbox.org>
 <20150505182257.6BF60E04DA@smtp.hushmail.com> <87bnhyal86.fsf@example.com>
 <20150505200024.8D647E04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150505200024.8D647E04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] the privacy of public tor descriptor data
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

l.m:
> Wow. You just blew my mind. So anonymity and privacy for users, but
> not contributors that make said privacy features possible?

if you're going to complain about others changing the subject, don't
blatantly do it yourself. relays have their public ip addresses
available to the public. that's never been secret.

> It was wrong to push the operator. 

the operators was mentioned on tor-talk. they chose to reply. they'll
live. if anything, this will benefit their research.

-- 
gpg key - 0x2A49578A7291BB34
fingerprint - 63C4 E106 AC6A 5F2F DDB2 3840 2A49 578A 7291 BB34

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

