Delivery-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 23:15:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594211E12CF
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat,  9 May 2015 23:15:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D9834E01;
	Sun, 10 May 2015 03:15:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E24334CDE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 03:15:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id J6KXrZEsmTmJ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 10 May 2015 03:15:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B0034CDB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so63263684wiu.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 09 May 2015 20:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ritter.vg; s=vg;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=JFwCUYA19Vd1aRHPTX4XsWBkE2vAzQOUU0MRKKlhT5E=;
 b=ElHZtr3/3RbPsD0SlI4clNVLUvE/BCTMhUdHT4qAhERkMmtxbqqSISYotmxXk1uCzW
 K7MtCX7e13cv0bMzK7guwr4CEAArK18fNcxsaWf/AVj+KXpNfCZ+/VU4vQA0C+BxDe7F
 iYHKOEcG2VbhX7tyU8LfAWN8TFXa0F7Ywtr/o=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=JFwCUYA19Vd1aRHPTX4XsWBkE2vAzQOUU0MRKKlhT5E=;
 b=Io6lns3wqzOhlpXx+kAsB+lIJEQYOmezgjzCimmU2Hu+2ddgscdss7HEms4xkAj88d
 h2vC0o1FzVU85xd7+3myw3/QfSR0IBXPg7LsrOIRrfsMN+fzdBS9tGE4E4SBVnTVmSGV
 11MF4GUdv8DqMzjXsEUqywf++S/IgF9V6jSs8fb4LEf/JEtohY9Vj0mHyvxklKKCBJdf
 vPXQxka1TWd1Gnk8OwcyP1Wi736y5CArbuf8aj/kDP7uiIIhvtURP8lptXW5VN6aZEyq
 ARfg+cS7ETohPrQ8uPBN+w5F0vrKGub+XiD1kjBWDwxqnWZWgRduPXp7RXPwDSQG0NHY
 W+vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltU1uEMVNyiHKRktaVj9i8cFI2dSLvk5C29acVNkNLBOljqIWvjUx557O+ft9QEUUiR+5o
X-Received: by 10.180.231.4 with SMTP id tc4mr8735174wic.27.1431227696962;
 Sat, 09 May 2015 20:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.141.80 with HTTP; Sat, 9 May 2015 20:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti282cHHv3iwTbe7Z-K+CMks-sEgUFUTd2=VZMd=PpR2ngA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+cU71kwWqGhtPaSbtQyOEtXXxTNUeJPULvnzvUCTC0oTxbu=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <16b261d3.1934b0ef@fabiankeil.de>
 <CA+cU71=ubxOH7-+=J9XB6Wqe0YOekOEWJtnXmzcggkOqaSP9CQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD2Ti282cHHv3iwTbe7Z-K+CMks-sEgUFUTd2=VZMd=PpR2ngA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 22:14:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+cU71kesUHcbwRn=7QUO_boh2bXMKR9FmmBwA4-gfMNpD8kQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] 100-Foot Overview on Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 6 May 2015 at 07:55, David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net> wrote:
> On 06 May (19:28:38), teor wrote:
>> Page 20:
>> Can you explain why you say that consensuses are valid for 24 hours, and not 3 hours?
>
> Indeed, according to dir-spec.txt, see section "1.4 Voting timeline",
> there is an explanation. The current tor code actually randomize some of
> those values to be in a specific range that is not more than 3 hours
> (iirc).

I believe that most places actually use the below function however:

https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/or/networkstatus.c#n1041

When I was talking with many of the DirAuths in Valencia, they said
that a 24-hour outage was necessary for the consensus to be well and
truly out of date.  I pointed out that wasn't what the consensus said,
but they insisted, and then I found this code.


>> Page 113:
>> I think there are 3 relays between the client and introduction point, not 2.
>> In new_route_len(), each circuit with an endpoint chosen by another relay gets an extra hop, and the hidden service chooses the introduction point, not the client.
>>
>> I could be wrong about this - the path code has a few special cases that I haven't quite got my head around.
>
> Yes you are right. Not only that but if the first introduction point
> fails (client side), the circuit is re-extended to the second intro
> point and so on until it works or the the maximum limit of 7 hops is
> reached.
>
> That's maybe a bit too deep to explain in the slides so I guess 4 hops
> Client <-> Intro is good enough. :)

Yea, the extension quirk I think is a bit much, but I fixed the number
of hops - now that I think about it closer, 3 makes more sense.



On 9 May 2015 at 12:35, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> wrote:
>> It's (now) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
>
> I looked but don't yet see that noted in the first or last slides.
>
> It would need to be editable for people to incorporate and tune
> the "text" to their audience. Images and pdf format are not text.
> I'd just post the source and pdf on your site for people to find.

Fixed, and redirects updated.

-tom
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

