Delivery-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:35:18 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF781E0B52;
	Thu,  3 Mar 2016 12:35:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8AC39FC3;
	Thu,  3 Mar 2016 17:35:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B763339F68
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2016 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id cdy0YHrpGlyy for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  3 Mar 2016 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D6D639B5A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2016 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
 (envelope-from <gno-or-talk-2@m.gmane.org>) id 1abX9U-0002m8-7v
 for tor-talk@lists.torproject.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:35:04 +0100
Received: from 65.19.167.132 ([65.19.167.132])
 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
 id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:35:04 +0100
Received: from lukep by 65.19.167.132 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
 id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:35:04 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: lukep <lukep@tutanota.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:31:01 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <loom.20160303T182308-878@post.gmane.org>
References: <k8zvpue--3-0@tutanota.com> <56a85c39.6080502@ahmia.fi>
 <DC644F66E44.00000281beatthebastards@inbox.com>
 <DD9B1122-4B5E-4206-B5C5-1722883675A9@riseup.net> <56B4BEF7.2020608@ahmia.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 65.19.167.132 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
 rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Warning: 37 new booby trapped onion sites
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Juha Nurmi <juha.nurmi <at> ahmia.fi> writes:


> First way I did this was pretty simple: I compared my real ahmia
> (msydqstlz2kzerdg.onion) to the fake one. I scanned them and detected
> the difference. The fake ahmia changes URLs to point to fake services.
> 
> Now I have several clever methods to detect fake websites.

Hi - the question as to which is the "real" onion address and which is the
"fake" one is a matter of interpretation. Normally there's a "real" onion
first and then some copy-cats later - then you can compare the copy-cats to
the original and decide that they are fakes. But what if you don't find out
about the "real" onion if you've already found the copy-cat first and put
that in your list? Or what if the "real" owner decides that they want to
change onion address, would you mark that as a "fake" ? 

It's not cut-and-dry, I appreciate that you're doing your best to find the
fakes and weed them out. It sounds like a hard job but someones gotta do it
so thanks.

-- lukep


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

