Delivery-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:09:32 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_URI_ONLY,
	DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EDEC1E0D11;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2016 20:09:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67D4395D6;
	Wed,  9 Mar 2016 01:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAB2395DA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  9 Mar 2016 01:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id EtfFlLpgXOrT for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed,  9 Mar 2016 01:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B193338CB3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  9 Mar 2016 01:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c3so38645328vkb.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:09:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=vrOyyZY4Y5I2zQEV9Pqwj9Jnu+qexRSjYz1oovlqeoo=;
 b=bnIVLnGhzzJ+HJyjsPejPdyccGwn1SD2tA5pXxnQu8u9a9njOmgQLahbpN/dNie3P4
 qiafFtuo/xbJM3gTriM8vin82x45vIMnvCa8Q6Vk29V33DepCSemkQrFfuIzT7ZAfXMF
 8AjYvPyvKIt+VdS4dvDeSZ44xUNhDjE/fOD4M3HxMM5VLbwXI7MxFgQmPEO9kcLXuJOC
 rbKraUPZ+bSgPf85gWiYQxe7I88rVtoHLoHSKnE7NVW2/vtJ/WYXoktR7VB9C7lLxP9z
 6TsgLRmDozXiYar+7iD32md1t3dsZyvozYsIpp2buwLJkGnUGlJ1XTXZwkyXTAHUZD4y
 RK1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=vrOyyZY4Y5I2zQEV9Pqwj9Jnu+qexRSjYz1oovlqeoo=;
 b=Uh2N+tDSNNEAzrRn9/daWtjmpPmVQDsJfPNrbuyP6+PpKOlWCPmIly8c7RSSEAv2j4
 LF9JzjtGkJziMa2bq/5G809GbD9I8eTqII8Cv2naA9gwZAqQ1a2oPtPMykTujpoCVb6e
 aXVDP4zyYY7Vk/Dtmqbb1WYytglhOD14csWX7MsykQbyKS/yA0HZ3mIQFSRIiDIoUf+V
 bjMbENqZFbKFQxhvXiTQiuG7x0uHiqKoco5rvzJAbB4BuEaBGgbTjr27JCOS2NxQv9TC
 OH6UQ6coa3RmS9m2+H7xtdhNgBmz9ZDwWDhV+KUhYUU6xuvPb2nVujhXD5+QANCGYDw5
 s2/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLfC4P2PZB47cYXt22kSAjUPjZaLzC1dX9d2wtKtsigVWKcH35CiY6hilClsiLQWJlpHnaQ1bM8zK1DDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.141.2 with SMTP id p2mr29901482vkd.37.1457485759104; Tue,
 08 Mar 2016 17:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.176.69.5 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:09:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56DF044A.1040003@sadiqs.com>
References: <ce61c6a69cb89961fb4c80cbbb9c5987@openmailbox.org>
 <56DF044A.1040003@sadiqs.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:09:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti28X9yQJCaEOPVYRvOjQ1kZR727dadqgMwHJE78cP785zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Does sending webmail using Tor increase the
 liklihood of it being regarded as spam?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Some black / geo lists assign special categories to residential, dhcp,
tor, etc. Though special pain awarded to them from header scanning
is maybe rare (given the mails themselves emit from known mail
providers)... it is possible.
It's also possible to perform metrics as a project to determine
what providers, if any, are doing this to the detriment of tor,
VPN, proxy and other such users...
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

