Delivery-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 02:01:34 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5A141E0C13;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2016 02:01:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C30D386E1;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2016 07:01:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82283617D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2016 07:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id KQ-_5ffAzymx for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  8 Mar 2016 07:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B5428434
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2016 07:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926681A1DED
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2016 07:01:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1457420480; bh=FGrozsrqBw18TqPxe1JKJlPLMbGYoulAw8gxBqGNjJk=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=JNvqH+0WZR+E/d+TX40KHiXu7bEb5/7fk6FkkQ7rRQpw6Y57xWN+nKAHVkdWjoUAu
 A7HiNsCwYCPNVcXpo1HGKCxGk9Usp62dSn+sZS9ZDR3MJl/g88xglAdKW6zESMmZ9l
 OHi7c3x6LjFM39DhSEXMt8nLpE4u2gWenKsQBcyU=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id EC33140045
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <8760wy4l4y.fsf@zhtux.jiantu.boxes>
 <20160307122401.GC15323@riseup.net> <877fhe3143.fsf@zhtux.jiantu.boxes>
 <20160307131319.GD15323@riseup.net>
 <4076b8c7e9f23bc176a1cfa214e79db9@autistici.org>
 <56DDD7D5.7070002@riseup.net> <87pov5puw9.fsf@zhtux.jiantu.boxes>
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56DE78BD.6080600@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:01:17 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87pov5puw9.fsf@zhtux.jiantu.boxes>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] cloudflare blocks connection
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 03/07/2016 07:26 PM, Fkqqrr wrote:
> Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> writes:
> 
>> On 03/07/2016 06:23 AM, fkqqrr@autistici.org wrote:
>>> On 2016-03-07 13:13, Pickfire wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:48:28PM +0800, fkqqrr wrote:
>>>>> Can 'disable javascript' unblock target site access?
>>>>
>>>> No, it doesn't, but you can solve those non-javascript captcha easier.
>>> Cloudflare uses visual captcha. What's is worse, even I correctly verify
>>> the visual captcha, cloudflare block my access.
>>>
>>> So I cannot bypass it currently.
>>
>> OpenVPN Onion VPS for Evading Discrimination Against Tor
>> https://dbshmc5frbchaum2.onion/OpenVPN-Onion-VPS.html
> Link down? cannot connect.

Oops :( Stupid me. I copied some text from a Wilders post, where I'd
pointed to a tor2web link.

It's http://dbshmc5frbchaum2.onion/OpenVPN-Onion-VPS.html

>> Basically, it's a VPN service that's reachable _only_ as an onion
>> service. So no exit nodes get wasted. But there's no crowding unless you
>> share the .onion with others. And once jerks are using it, it will get
>> blacklisted, and the VPS may be taken down. So it goes.
>>
>> I must emphasize that this is _only_ safe if you lease the VPS as
>> anonymously as you need to be for the sites that you'll be browsing. You
>> do everything through Tor. You provide fake contact information, use a
>> fresh email address, and pay with well-mixed Bitcoin. Mix at least
>> twice, among independent wallets in different Whonix instances, using
>> different mixing services. And check for taint at each stage.
>>
>>>>> CAPTCHA needs javascript submit verification code.
>>>>
>>>> No, there is an html version which is easier that uses a POST method.
>>
>> I've generally found the Javascript CAPTCHAs to be easier. For a while,
>> they were just house numbers. Now it's image classification. And their
>> criteria are ambiguous. Is the pole supporting a sign part of the sign?
>>
>>>> I heard that it is easier to create a script that breaks the audio
>>>> captcha compare to the visual captcha.
>>
>> No audio here ;) Too dangerous.
> Why audio dangerous?

I was joking, at least a little. Listening is OK, as long as nobody's
eavesdropping. But speaking, that is not OK. Impossible to anonymize,
except by converting to text and then speech synthesis. Then why bother?
It's faster to just type.

>>>>> Whatever you are, be a good one
>>>>
>>>> CAPTCHA isn't a good one.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> web: http://pickfire.wha.la/
>>>> gpg: rsa4096/DBD0F842
>>>
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

