Delivery-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:11:06 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BD21E0851;
	Mon,  7 Mar 2016 14:11:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC96386E1;
	Mon,  7 Mar 2016 19:10:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557A837F9C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  7 Mar 2016 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ff1AERfgpmyy for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  7 Mar 2016 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp11.openmailbox.org (smtp11.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.45])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC1537E93
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  7 Mar 2016 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1004)
 id BA6172ACA6BE; Mon,  7 Mar 2016 20:10:50 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1457377850;
 bh=ERv/RzuY2JM5D8zRBBv0SWms3qbLS6Q8mDfMhlLdz1A=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=A9nmn8hcCWBPPjx7C7yv7OSd98efj8peGAk7JKNZl7+ukBelGgE1uAqRPP4Uahtkq
 bMO4G35yq5PgteiHeRtIwUHcZM+p+P1sPShEpG433HKZKVm57laGXGV16QQ2TWX2vh
 5FhQQ7oM4pTzP2DvXfxM6XuZabHBs91ASAlVEWig=
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (openmailbox-b1 [10.91.69.218])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865112ACA62E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  7 Mar 2016 20:10:41 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 19:10:41 +0000
From: blobby@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <ce61c6a69cb89961fb4c80cbbb9c5987@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: blobby@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6
Subject: [tor-talk] =?utf-8?q?Does_sending_webmail_using_Tor_increase_the_?=
 =?utf-8?q?liklihood_of_it_being_regarded_as_spam=3F?=
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I am wondering if using an exit node IP increases the possibility that 
sending email from a webmail provider is more likely to end up in the 
recipient's spam folder. For example, sending email from 
hello@vfemail.net to goodbye@hotmail.com

I think not because, from the email headers I have seen, the exit node 
IP is never included in the message headers at the destination.

The IP of the sender is that of the webmail provider not the exit node. 
So it should not matter because, even if the exit node IP is "bad", it 
is never seen by the recipient.

Thoughts?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

