Delivery-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 14:54:25 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E2B1E04FF;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 14:54:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F9139CCD;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C263239CCC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id EjEFV9v12MxC for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53ECD38FA2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.60] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTkNU-1aJSVv03YO-00QWoo for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:54:11 +0100
References: <loom.20160316T091856-306@post.gmane.org>
 <20160316161339.GP8732@moria.seul.org> <56EDC127.1080707@gmx.com>
 <CAD2Ti28QZ_=f-FpMrHsG7u6az4=zwqX3zOUDKchq1d1WmHOQkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <56EDD1D6.1040501@gmx.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <56F6DAC1.7060908@gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:53:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56EDD1D6.1040501@gmx.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NmBsNVdARxmtNrRBRhLU9moDK5HjKfUaQs9TQIU36qBEDzafrH4
 so5hlqMnYGoMHep4FaLD0W7KGvzTPFtDB0jL3hwOwUxyKHRn+t5tAXgkTJ+lH+stUGVFX2q
 R/cy0ic7AAD2DN3xSHEY/p8b645/owk7PZe/3Qhy1bvrRZQ3elt/Bsn9ZVXIc0UjGBEq+aq
 htzyAKy6QfHQEmCGhH+Sg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:k8he3eZSxao=:LzYaj8kKjhxH4eW5ap2NSZ
 SoFvIrl597e/j1l9tm1lSyH6ayD/oK0xnqEzN+QGsORdiR9QTPV4wAWjyMYXPfHt24lpjMosP
 XTDJVgF2tyYssk2o3dsH4pn9Xsm9M37eG3zqMvwiczqEyTPqrYJs3Fbd0ftArNzYULez+7/yj
 E3SfuufBU+gTnANqx3dNeNszyjRIJEFfGWKs1Lbv4Y/FSP1KLdnrzBHufvpy0b6SEKimnK5cJ
 PtCgknCxx4MVkvHH+4dSe6O4dyCvtnKVjT4hajnypqVCs+mXShgSVV3QP+6gzc/2l7Xpr3+Vb
 z/ZkNVIc5XcloWCDZOXRDTYjL9STwLjxDt+d4ss+JvzXd0hNQf3ZoKKjmdfse+LyOhOXTNM6K
 xab+H1tVP+IFfxiz3RbfJWEm7RVpQ8rbozD4btwTNgB3hWKvwul7kEYj4W26So6VHPbHyxkQK
 eGBfRsKPfuDTnFegK/etdEiYoQoBJsNYRUE9haTgkOI32ejZkEIRPwRK7ePU3RhL/ga+TxI/X
 gp+wAYxVtha57/6KIif8ZncPJGGcCWuv6xFcEajP6YDHE7Z0M6oMno5otLb8XeiRXVMVo0crX
 b9sBZlaGz+g5Y9PeiKEARoYnE5ODjl5xdsdA9vsce7OlDcGMpDOio3utfnTyKddGl4oPoLL/D
 lZg0iBi/WvLNP3G8WYoBswyg8kVhDScK/0FWfqMAG9Gyvh8zRHz6AWqP4J7k/KiJfL5kKotp8
 nNAPLgNcYVCQCqNNROBihkYAHO9TzAVITu3M1rgvuWRGxvQaGX3CHZSpaUJn/pcYIOFEjKerV
 hPm8+xD
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Why my tor-assigned IP address differs from that of
 exit node ?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 3/19/2016 5:25 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 3/19/2016 4:48 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> On 3/19/16, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com> wrote:
>>> In TBB 5.5.4, why does part of the URL that's copied / pasted, look so
>>> pale gray after loading, it's almost unreadable?
>> Go to about:config search url / urlbar.
> Thank you.
> The preference, "browser.urlbar.formatting.enabled; True" seems to allow
> part of the url to be pale gray.
>
For now, can someone comment if changing the about:config pref 
controlling the URL font color (formatting) to 'False' is another 
browser trait that sites can detect & use to fingerprint?
Could they detect the full URL was consistent color, instead of part 
black & part light gray?

Maybe if looking at a device screen a few inches away, the URL being 
light gray isn't hard to read.
On a desktop, it's harder - for me.

Some on Fx forums commented it was a "security feature," that hilights 
the base domain, to better show  redirection, spoofing, etc.
Understood - but the rest of URL is so pale - w/ default Times New Roman 
font, it's easy to misread & adding another problem.  An issue to direct 
to Mozilla.  Like change the *base domain* darkER / bolder, not the rest 
of URL to washed out gray.


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

