Delivery-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:50:30 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9E71E03F2;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:50:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBD339556;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:50:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17553393AA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 72mae2AX_siA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CC139378
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:50:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.163])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A3EF1AB9B6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:50:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1459014616; bh=zAUqPTkBdFopNqgZte4PJjevBaFPTrXhY6wgyEkRByg=;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From;
 b=PxPAurB9G1EpV5f8X8aHUJpitfPptkMBIrkUUx0AC0QaYxv/2KQTsyOf6J50NOJUj
 HkDEQCizDHVWDXYsYggPQ7ctvjoE2QgE8qiJFWhOFp8i95KkHu8jFQ5J7gjWncwg8s
 zK+Uji+PcbDDVkTvFoVvyKNPKAmYkq5r65CKiF5o=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: flipchan) with ESMTPSA id 5694F1C0047
In-Reply-To: <07c479b485e9bc323f5e455a4718e00f@thinkpenguin.com>
References: <07c479b485e9bc323f5e455a4718e00f@thinkpenguin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Flipchan <flipchan@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:50:10 +0100
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <285C7889-6DDC-4DF7-AABC-E56F13F2AA33@riseup.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Raid of LFM studio over supposed access of onion
	site by unknown party
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Only way is to fight fire with fire , we at the tor community will never give up against fighting against gov or simular anti-tor factors , thnks for the info

Chris <tmail299@errtech.com> skrev: (26 mars 2016 17:31:46 CET)
>I thought I'd just bring to the attention of the Tor community a very 
>public (it was recorded and those involved have spoken about it) raid 
>that occurred upon which the FBI listed in the warrant an onion site 
>that was connected to what appears to have been Playpen where child
>porn 
>was being distributed by the FBI. In this incident they placed bits of 
>code on users of the sites systems which enabled them to identify the 
>user's IP.
>
>While it is believe that the home and studio that was raided did not 
>contain any child pornography the objective seems to have been to 
>discredit a very public critic of the FBI: Ian Freeman.
>
>http://freekeene.com/2016/03/22/news-and-blog-coverage-of-fbi-raid/
>https://www.freetalklive.com/archives
>
>This appears to be a direct attack on political persons in the 
>libertarian community. It is not the first attack. Local government 
>raided the KAT (Keen Activist Center, which I believe is the same
>place) 
>a few years back and there have been many other legal attacks on Ian
>and 
>other libertarians in the community. Including an attack on James 
>Cleveland for recording the police (he won) and Rich Paul (he was 
>arrested for selling pot, but the actual amount was insignificant, and 
>immediately tried to get him to be an informant on the KAT, he turned 
>that down and went to trial, and got a year, but risked spending as
>much 
>as 100 years in doing so). Among many other legal shenanigans... all
>for 
>being peaceful activists...
>
>Anyway- I thought people may want to keep an eye on this. People wonder
>
>why we need Tor. Well, not only do we need it overseas we need it right
>
>here in the United States. If you speak publicly against the mainstream
>
>or against the FBI's choices (like distributing child porn, which two 
>weeks earlier was covered by the show, and they were critical of the
>FBI 
>in doing this) you might just get raided. I am not aware of the FBI 
>actually raiding anybody else in connection to Playpen (or users
>anyway, 
>yet) so it seems quite politically motivated. I'm also a little
>doubtful 
>there ever actually was a connection here. Somebody 'accidentally' 
>misread something and testified to get the warrant in order to
>discredit 
>them or similar is my suspicion right now. They'll probably find 
>something, but it won't be child porn, and even if they did, I'd call
>it 
>suspect, given all the facts. The FBI aren't angels and play dirty all 
>the time. Yet- we are suppose to trust them, the courts, etc and the 
>convictions (or guilty pleas when they twist your arm so there are no 
>other options of defense).
>
>
>-- 
>tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

-- 
Sincerly Flipchan
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

