Delivery-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:40:17 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E1E1E032A;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:40:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE783968D;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:40:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C4F3962A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id JpjKeOsueTB0 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3010239542
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
 (envelope-from <gno-or-talk-2@m.gmane.org>) id 1ajqJn-0005Us-J4
 for tor-talk@lists.torproject.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:40:03 +0100
Received: from chomsky.torservers.net ([77.247.181.162])
 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
 id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:40:03 +0100
Received: from o.wendel by chomsky.torservers.net with local (Gmexim 0.1
 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:40:03 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: Oskar Wendel <o.wendel@wp.pl>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:38:19 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <nd6adb$qjt$3@ger.gmane.org>
References: <nci43k$3ee$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CAJVRA1SOk_FBO7wXi_tHbFzfPdG21KK5M++45iGcv9tJ8uRs3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160319034044.GQ8732@moria.seul.org> <ncjbkj$tfr$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CAJVRA1RJNXY3DanOQdzp6_AOoapNrrw5gYqJPUKFvHkjEuexTA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: chomsky.torservers.net
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Traffic shaping attack
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

coderman <coderman@gmail.com>:

>> Let's assume that the service is extremely popular, with over 6 terabytes
>> of traffic each day, and a gigabit port almost constantly saturated. Then,
>> we can observe a small handset of guards and still be able to spot at
>> least some users.
> 
> the problem with high traffic sites is a local confirmation attack.
> E.g. your colo line is really active! and on a short list of suspects
> above large traffic threshold.

Yes, it's true and it's another problem to deal with. I don't know what 
(if any) measures admin took to protect himself. Maybe the site is hosted 
in a jurisdiction where the site content is legal, who knows.

- -- 
Oskar Wendel, o.wendel@wp.pl.REMOVE.THIS
Pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB5E3846CD40F08E3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW9qznAAoJELXjhGzUDwjjE/EH/RdcRsWcVaN0wh+j6g8JukrG
qyG/9RgCavWZh8Y0bHVpzymOmr19OecjpnzyjsfrCQN27pxFBInowat9r79+xIQc
j8EV7NpktRjuX+pRhfC8pBgFymGdrhE9gtQ1J/RA+r2JjEyLUDkolUHAHcAjwbVN
kHGZwtLhaC651t0XdhBzc5zSUeiqmEZX94q325KadNwr0zkpTS57RB77pd1sTl+H
IqZkNdcDhkr7wwqEQS1OFaSZxfcHsy55cnXSzIfcUawq2YDhJMrajfLJchz0kEgr
9GZoaNKh6koIlA8JXDbbsChMuEZEpUz0xG8hHQFgaVgd50w7EUECH1eQ2xTThsM=
=bjMx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

