Delivery-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:26:11 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569E11E0A5E;
	Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410736E9A;
	Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:26:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338882843A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id HVuezKEolrlC for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B776428434
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:26:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.60] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3zG2-1ZqxK32kGw-00rZfn for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 23:25:58 +0100
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <loom.20160316T091856-306@post.gmane.org>
 <20160316161339.GP8732@moria.seul.org> <56EDC127.1080707@gmx.com>
 <CAD2Ti28QZ_=f-FpMrHsG7u6az4=zwqX3zOUDKchq1d1WmHOQkA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <56EDD1D6.1040501@gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:25:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti28QZ_=f-FpMrHsG7u6az4=zwqX3zOUDKchq1d1WmHOQkA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7sVVfhxr7W48s1/dATnHC0GB1lWClvvr/OmA4LZD5GryYKYFqG7
 95uUKdR29OPuZrb3SmbgC1eog+QvwYbAh9EC5qf2nMIHVpmxqZlSVv9ulzOvSRS7KFJTw2e
 6IIrIpMFNbe2tD9nliS1asr/CvjweYzLoKso/KOkOc5M/FRu63bnvRm8wI4GPHjo5OEW7z1
 GpzPYgHaQMqmjx87aDG1Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:SYSJh0vOFfM=:70VMxavomCVcDAICltuqwt
 VKEO6PZJERI5TXVvvXRKbFZTJhCNE80qI4MLkGjrSRy2uTyx+cL0eBZontL8Jb7rOtyiM3qCr
 U+085Ve4jJ96264aSnUoW+W+Zt5Ym+gF4iDlmHrVv8LjcHMwiBNsFamqE+hhJyynJFsoV6W6L
 5iAVhwlNWccuu3cxC051gU5+D8XQSv9cgG6VWlIxsZSfcvK/2b3KDWZ1GFfWkSOqMd1GHXlHd
 5BghhyvKGFuKdHQ9jYl0o0qJiROkHY1aoV2ybcqvCV+pxmUw+XJcDmSJshX8gMpOTRt1cKhYW
 LLAG4XCJRKZBTrNnH4jGjxEq+lckUysKfscyKkTO/yFPdFgE1XdteQ03ZZulxZiJ9qL7A+c1b
 egKP8Jtb1uxJfWTkWLbm41NSyhSsBH4KLezkHAqL/839QFNx8ZHvoAa1pvsAKSQWFGkXYkU9B
 cc5+fwa9BJfeEZZllyGG0ftwEHnDm5mlbrTfNNmAJe67aYddbrNrjFOovcvy0uRyOdSQV8vXm
 K9jGTCuA/2mS5IHg/YcQjaY9K6ocuVCiFSrU7RbrzLYy+Li3oyDNQxImPnBlHgLkuO17Jz8wA
 ZFxvdyzfxZyifCMPjxj8w8phsgyRNm85Pm8el44B55WrWgE0Ipvd6jdXr98ZJwDR1ympSTe47
 bd0p5qCscnwfCfHFhh5fA3Ge/WYFsY5l847/NhD4ed6rTnvcmEGYOuRuzQ1XyAEbdjHKWFzyt
 z/BbWDLTujLrbaVgf2PnJSjuqnIgbBBdS8hMpQTRVXqPUpEm+VL844q93X2uhwOV0jOxiNJfC
 aoGdcdp
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Why my tor-assigned IP address differs from that of
 exit node ?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 3/19/2016 4:48 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On 3/19/16, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com> wrote:
>> In TBB 5.5.4, why does part of the URL that's copied / pasted, look so
>> pale gray after loading, it's almost unreadable?
> Go to about:config search url / urlbar.
Thank you.
The preference, "browser.urlbar.formatting.enabled; True" seems to allow 
part of the url to be pale gray.

That doesn't answer my question - if changing that to False - making all 
URL text always uniformly dark is a good idea?
Whether that or most UI change could be detected by pages & used for 
fingerprinting?

If we're not supposed to change main browser font style, or even the 
minimum font size allowed (if those are still true), then I'd guess 
sites could detect almost any UI variance from default?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

