Delivery-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:07:54 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656651E0AEC;
	Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:07:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D5F383C7;
	Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:07:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2435038360
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:07:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id DDu9VRxhfQ3D for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:07:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F403832C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.60] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LmrZY-1a9Ag50Ht6-00h2RY for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 23:07:41 +0100
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <1457609880.2624.6.camel@darkdepths.net>
 <7fd607f54752b72153a3c633767e421f@cannon-ciota.info>
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <56EDCD8E.5070804@gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:07:10 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7fd607f54752b72153a3c633767e421f@cannon-ciota.info>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4OiV6XP0repQojj5wu1/Nc/FVR0voHU7H5c1kA/7A0XcY8or+il
 Kut9eFde8kNtU7LNvNgsJTRCzlHzUT4KE0ouFkMVsm1lZWTElvwM2if2MzZ2eFb7NKovx5R
 +Q5EQdwShMODCjYgreNdfCXSxUNboouMj0oAqEKNdTUM19H7Hby/noYTuiQiaccYtB6WCSZ
 WafXT7Jn1HZEg0r6yBdeg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:yvnwsWAu9b8=:Hbo5ZmVnctqkJcKdHoRKYa
 VQGyWLm9g0WToEKItERLa/MhMIxGyD326KAhfqBf8+gxURav6JUdaJsqHDfT+cH9QyI14Qi8W
 sIsqibo5MVYTqZvl4+56BJKxHsuha5ZFDC4pZ/aHkAm1Ft+GKmC1OQ3z0Yt+H3CDwsipG/OM9
 jpaag/3RJpM+sfVZlNmgCrfr5KxYFTIIRI90Vv4eBL5yvwKTnpcev3d/2ojL8XZ8rL5F01uqU
 vz9ZiRIe51R7DDyNBdXGv7tQIenK+0iRRA/HOXzWDevi4Vyrvpg2MKR52oxLfIyeTB4zXwhMi
 R5VpxIhZnKaEbNZaxk8fht6EdGosk1opwiyYUHsT922hbvedIkvSMwqQ2NLns1UCUb6qT76IV
 uZKr5vY8qzK9fqOxBPWkzw0hRp4vm5TSRXtSQRExkHwcqb8qs+62S4nuzlV7vdYMKcyzoHFvW
 9WbUyIioeFNiPv/xUJ8G4OdBWe8q1pdOKb+FHQcJ2wbY9eW48OXVwVZDDmSCo+fQRTL6L25GF
 I1850KFIlsc9AwBdUjDo4rnAgiYN0X1OwS2HgKVaRrj1X9ujJEv8oE26GRWt5Sxj9Qyb6Cye4
 GRzcFEmFKYlrKU0PJ5QJZ62XbQmakxnOFHIMwd1W07rgrql4PFuptEO2x+HqUi32Nog4UJ9GA
 b+Oq7aQvKmDkfY+K8R5Ia+CzQMFfQn9BrzsTWPJRE562NHD4qVJa0NtofoTdsItzOy9OspsiA
 f5Haa2OnmKvW0gPBbaGihEnf9NnG7A5N9N2Hz5c97cqkoPvT5X61rJpSYTa+DkAaGk1v7LCVW
 a4MZBQi
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Question about Circuit Separation
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 3/10/2016 6:00 AM, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote:
>> This is a question about Tor Browser in specific.
>>
>> I've found a number of websites [0] [1] [2] that explicitly warn of
>> visiting your personal website over tor. The explanation is always that
>> if you "access other sites in the same session", an eavesdropper would
>> deduce that it was the owner of the (little-read) personal site.
>>
>> Doesn't Tor Browser use a new circuit for each domain? Is the advice
>> faulty or am I missing something?
> I think this advice was aimed for the time before Tor Browser utilized
> circuit isolation for each website. However you should still be aware
> that tracking cookies could contaminate the other circuits within the
> same browser session.
>
> Cannon C.
>
Which Tracking cookies?
Not the ones mentioned under "Identifier Unlinkability Defenses in the 
Tor Browser"?
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/#identifier-linkability

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

