Delivery-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:05:30 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DD71E0B07;
	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:05:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E07C386E6;
	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:05:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832F3380E3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:05:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id qWMFzAiAdJN0 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:05:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28AE537F73
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:05:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d82so22336143lfe.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=rathhansen.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=13sY5mkYb1vDyIfg/Ts4G+KNg0Ix/pfIA9gfwtMvVvM=;
 b=rlpiE3MJaClphdDIewV28SmGoN80iqLgyp6R+2coR/napqrnQJbemvIpTkEKTz2dPn
 kBN0JzqNbOxenitG2wQloCR9/auQb9ZKrQT3J43hXL8jpTCeIs9K71XZuzfJ6/gkeKyt
 s4NdOX7tcf8bCBGpxi+k9Fiem1bPS60gdcNZ8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=13sY5mkYb1vDyIfg/Ts4G+KNg0Ix/pfIA9gfwtMvVvM=;
 b=D/ME63/skOFjHQiEqKGFArAurQ5Nlywcd6pu5AI/JzaVisux5JcAUFnl7C3aDm5BPx
 15ADCBdq04lg1Zv7MmYTGmdCEwL2mMEFpVFAt38nZV/gUQm0dBxT+297sqR4BbJQJc6M
 42Bw05njW5UvEswIehFRD8iET5zjWgLsPHurXKRyaGzKZ+rxt0ycL4Vy2+cJUokJCqtJ
 Xw/ORnY6VZBp1qcIa64n9APZU4yrtKx/PLoTddAG/+d/crbQXlTRU1FnfBTAAIspTW6Q
 tJNCu0b3KZINOPCP9kEg6mP4CefBeaUbf4EPfJiuDGOv9Pgz3I6dYx82xzLox+Y/HWXk
 pGcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKpLIHoG69a4YacrPLFj9kDsPXaAy1B2TFPzTVSi7q/ISZxd9swS27iiZjY7SpTLTn2G3GrYiaKztZ37w==
X-Received: by 10.25.146.145 with SMTP id u139mr6395196lfd.113.1458317110899; 
 Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <376D7DC9-D22E-4692-A2F9-E6CEC29E617B@torproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <376D7DC9-D22E-4692-A2F9-E6CEC29E617B@torproject.org>
From: Kristoffer Rath Hansen <kristoffer@rathhansen.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:05:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CAF=Sc9iNj643roBJZEYHhPLgEdaJEEeb3TONWcyxX9oKePZvow@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Invalid consensus today
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Thanks a lot for the clarification.

fre. 18. mar. 2016 kl. 17.00 skrev Sebastian Hahn <sebastian@torproject.org
>:

> Hi there,
>
> different threads on this list have already begun popping up about
> today's 0700 UTC consensus. The reason is that the dirauths did
> not produce a consensus that was signed by all 9, but rather the
> vote was split (this happens sometimes and usually causes no great
> concern). The dirauth dannenberg was on the winning side of split,
> so the produced consensus had just 5 signatures, the minimum
> required amount for a consensus to be valid. Unfortunately, its key
> changed recently and that change has not yet been communicated via
> a new Tor stable release. Thus, any Tor not configured to trust
> dannenberg's new key would've rejected the consensus as signed by
> just 4 directory authorities.
>
> Now that all 9 are in agreement again this problem is gone and there
> should be no more logs appearing from this incident.
>
> Cheers
> Sebastian
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

