Delivery-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:35:29 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA641E0FF6;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:35:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D67539615;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:35:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49412395C1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id LLFOqubPPHZZ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.posteo.de",
 Issuer "StartCom Class 3 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185E0392D5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:35:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13])
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7684208DF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:35:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3qPcbS45T9z5vN9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:35:16 +0100 (CET)
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
Message-ID: <56E81D46.1050206@posteo.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:33:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [tor-talk] What IPs does Torbrowser need?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


Hi

Imagine a router that wants to only whitelist the IP addresses that
Torbrowser needs to work. What IPs would it need (for start up and
browsing and everything) ?

 * Guards
 * Authorities
 * HSDir flagged relays (?)

and would such a whitelisting of IPs even be enough? At least I think
DNS can be ignored as it is routed over Tor too. Any more thoughts?


                       martin
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

