Delivery-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:23:42 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4128D1E01B0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed,  4 Mar 2015 15:23:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D5834693;
	Wed,  4 Mar 2015 20:23:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914DF34692
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  4 Mar 2015 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id adG1htZSDX1p for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed,  4 Mar 2015 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6C534690
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  4 Mar 2015 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qcrw7 with SMTP id w7so39388883qcr.4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:23:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=98YdyEKBNllwUsdEIFbJNs1k2efFYkLA1xKIZgjCK6U=;
 b=BAavX3yNOqVwtKZvxNlazbLnvbU08ZR2ffhrP9T4HP9tUQgIW/XoANP5WkYxN6GX4F
 bsbYu8nwNbFZM69ZkBqUvVQw6tDsd74etIV28U0n/nzsMueupA77Kg4fQyE+lEpyaDZR
 XIbY1aEMmRHz9gRL1pzXlqKF7KMG7VOWErYLVITW2Ju/1gyRs3cal57LYOF2LdgaQKyx
 SYJ9zeV3pyLdFuWD0PYjggpBhqbCMr7gPo+7whnJFKtLn2g7yvK4ihkqI3Cx5+m+GeXN
 twMAyeBaTuFX5jRW64tcxxWo1aFJeJBNDOCy6ZuaPRmQTkDSEPsmk90y6mAzauRVWcuv
 sbwg==
X-Received: by 10.140.196.70 with SMTP id r67mr8383066qha.45.1425500610001;
 Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:23:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (host208.190-229-66.telecom.net.ar. [190.229.66.208])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 s2sm2778768qan.25.2015.03.04.12.23.28
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:23:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54f769c1.0263e00a.0d48.1cb5@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:26:32 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <N1-UBwBNitGpB@Safe-mail.net>
References: <N1-UBwBNitGpB@Safe-mail.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New Tor project idea for internet comments
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 14:11:33 -0500
"Lee Malek" <leemalek@Safe-mail.net> wrote:

> This has nothing to do with people censoring tor users and everything
> to do with normal blogs censoring normal users because they don't
> like their comments. I am thinking mainly of the USA here. This will
> be a problem as time progresses.


	Don't bother. The party line here is to 'fight' for 'freedom'
	in places where the american imperialist military has problems
	gathering 'intelligence'. 

	Prime example : A country like china is firewalled  so the 
	pentagon can't spy on the chinese internet directly. Hence,
	tor. 

	And of course, in a place like the US you're going to find
	extensive censorship in 'public' and 'private' websites. Hell
	that is American Freedom! In a united state people should be
	free to censor any kind of disent. 


> 
> This allows sharing of information directly on news sites, safely and
> anonymously, completely circumventing their censoring of other
> political views. How is this not the place for something like this?
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: michael ball <michaelballriseup@gmail.com>
> Apparently from: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New Tor project idea for internet comments
> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:39:05 -0700
> 
> > This isn't technically feasible-- for example, censored users in
> > countries with slow Internet speeds (Iran, Cuba, Syria) would be
> > unable to connect to the network by being forced to relay
> > connections if they install the browser plugin. The Tor network
> > relies on volunteers who have the ability to quickly and safely
> > relay traffic to do so, and users who do not have those abilities
> > are not at a disadvantage.
> > 
> > Tor developers, community members and volunteers could better spend
> > the time creating this system for something that yields more
> > results, like actually encouraging the websites who censor Tor
> > users to not do so-- they should rather use a CAPTCHA system or
> > another form of human verification (that does not break anonymity).
> > 
> > > So many news website block comments they dont like these days.
> > 
> > This isn't something new or exclusive to Tor users. Anyone who
> > creates a website with a comment system can censor and prune the
> > comments they don't agree with. I do agree, a separate comment
> > system would be great at fighting the censorship by websites, but
> > it isn't something the Tor developers should focus on.
> > 
> > Good idea, but not exactly the right place. Thanks for the idea, and
> > welcome to the Tor mailing list!
> > -- 
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

