Delivery-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:14:15 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657971E0A65
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue,  3 Mar 2015 14:14:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B0233F30;
	Tue,  3 Mar 2015 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08ED33ED9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 Mar 2015 19:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hPy-ezbUMobk for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  3 Mar 2015 19:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com (imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com
 [192.64.116.199])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "privateemail.com",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A000733CBE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 Mar 2015 19:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042158800DA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 Mar 2015 14:14:02 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com
Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id DcFW4eg6py0c for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  3 Mar 2015 14:14:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.42.162] (135-23-87-110.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.87.110])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5F828800CB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 Mar 2015 14:14:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54F607FC.1060105@adrienj.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:14:04 -0500
From: Adrien Johnson <adrienj@adrienj.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <54F506C7.6020202@adrienj.com>
 <CALoT2zYkwUEguD-bN+hsePTK8a+G=HRWju6s3yGtiQA5+G5Waw@mail.gmail.com>
 <54F51F38.30902@adrienj.com>
 <CAKrUFkh4fd9tkssVXiUs0g_X5vRYH2FBA4Te0nJGRtyM2Qy0dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <54F524EE.3050400@adrienj.com> <54F58AAD.5010000@donncha.is>
 <54F5B9DC.9010101@adrienj.com>
 <CAGH6_ppvP-1B8F_7w2QN95x4Dy8j0rjwhbbeYB1tUCk4GNzVGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <54F5DA0C.3090403@adrienj.com>
 <CAGH6_pr7gVxRRdGqaDhJdSL3yMhN4w6ZHfFnjJFWDubuWZjiig@mail.gmail.com>
 <54F5E683.5060507@adrienj.com>
 <CAD2Ti2_CqnqV1mGuBt1xXzzDkVptSkB=d63ogzDJSBc16s520A@mail.gmail.com>
 <54F6025C.9040801@adrienj.com>
 <CAD2Ti28jhVCiJS9ieBcq7CpJv8dUA3rqZx9_j-zTLFZJNzDHNw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti28jhVCiJS9ieBcq7CpJv8dUA3rqZx9_j-zTLFZJNzDHNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Revoking a hidden service key
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I'm not saying it wouldn't still be useful, it just doesn't provide any 
protection in the scenario a running hidden service is hacked, which is 
what we were talking about.

On 2015-03-03 2:09 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Duhr, I know this, it's just another excuse to not do anything.
> Pathetic given the relative simplicity of adding passphrase
> option vs benefit of not being able to troll fs, backups, etc
> for keys. Bitcoin added wallet passphrases for the same reason.
> Defense in depth.

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

