Delivery-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:43:27 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C74C1E04C0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD434BA8;
	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:43:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17F834BA7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 35VsJFrikSqK for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.adb-centralen.se (smtp.adb-centralen.se [193.10.5.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D23034BA6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from flogsta (smtp.adb-centralen.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8::129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by smtp.adb-centralen.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52F25A1F770;
 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:43:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Linus Nordberg <linus@nordberg.se>
To: Nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>
References: <550C9A31.30203@openmailbox.org> <87wq28jef7.fsf@nordberg.se>
 <5510107E.2050603@openmailbox.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:43:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5510107E.2050603@openmailbox.org> (nusenu@openmailbox.org's
 message of "Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:09:18 +0000")
Message-ID: <87h9taaiqm.fsf@nordberg.se>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Who runs the Tor Network? An Overview using MyFamily
	Data
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org> wrote
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:09:18 +0000:

| > This is probably not going to work as intended with how MyFamily
| > works. I guess we should call a-f a big happy family and be done
| > with it.
| 
| For simplicity reasons probably, but I don't see any reason why a tor
| client would have a problem with that? And the group-by family
| analysis has no problem with it either. If this kind of MyFamily
| configuration is intended by the operators than it is no
| misconfiguration by design.

You're right. nodelist_add_node_and_family() considers two relays to be
in the same family when they both claim that the other relay is in their
family, regardless of what the set of relays in the two MyFamily
settings look like.


| Just in most cases it probably is. For clarity reasons it would be
| great if 'organizational' relays (d,e,f) would have distinct
| contactInfo (compared to personal relays (a,b,c).

In this particular case, DFRI's relays do have distinct contact info.

If you do take this into account, I don't understand why a line like the
followin would appear in your list. But maybe you didn't for this list?

1.2952%  1355 0.7602%   1.6044%   1.5300%   4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg <linus@no   (8 relays)                                (4)    (6)    (2) (4)             (4)
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

