Delivery-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:43:30 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4154B1E0326
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4AC34769;
	Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE97B34745
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:43:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id oEZ7nKtL6hOy for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:43:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com (hapkido.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.122])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE200346E3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:43:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com
 [208.113.200.129])
 by hapkido.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F997C9BBC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBAE118060
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=spx.li; h=message-id:date
 :subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding; s=spx.li; bh=GeUKRcwVWVa1ONj2Zl7sOhes
 SSo=; b=ApnE6jxKLv1OtTLt/UxWOtcw9kY6pKVYTE6Kld7UbiGKfLdDjR41iXj0
 zrTktkdfl1OG4kihxFUIeGy4rjRnZohRgM0RambzXTn+cYJ22UhOMsme3b90AWB8
 5uab/gpXeZALEsfHoFMs0+mqDnv3W5CGKpSRPIl9Gvw93pqi2xQ=
Received: from webmail.spx.li (caiajhbihbdd.dreamhost.com [208.97.187.133])
 (Authenticated sender: zooey@spx.li)
 by homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EF4CE11805C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 96.18.235.79 (SquirrelMail authenticated user zooey@spx.li)
 by webmail.spx.li with HTTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:42:51 -0700
Message-ID: <f6e91551eb59a28c5035fcc1029eb444.squirrel@webmail.spx.li>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:42:51 -0700
From: zooey@spx.li
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [tor-talk] Security Audit / Debunking
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I've been debunking some inaccurate marketing claims from a software
community and I've begun to receive online harassment for it.  They are
now planning on releasing censorship circumvention software that is deeply
confused.

I was hoping that someone from the Tor community would be willing to
analyze their software and post their results publicly.  The analysis does
not need to be very involved, I've already found plenty of problems with
it.

The end analysis would in no way be officially sanctioned by the Tor
project, I'm just looking for a reputable second voice in the hopes that
it will defray personal attacks.

If you are interested, please email zooey@spx.li.

Thanks,
=96Zooey

-- =

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

