Delivery-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:51:44 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E521E022D
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:51:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2207534152;
	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AFB33EC5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hjI38CmcM1KG for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.134])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "smtp.hushmail.com" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E5B33B0E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A60F8A0239
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46])
 by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
 id 326BBE0451; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:27 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:51:26 -0400
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: "l.m" <ter.one.leeboi@hush.com>
In-Reply-To: <550876E7.4050206@hireahit.com>
References: <b6cb75245c0c0ec46b713575b96647e1@openmailbox.org>
 <20150316113315.GD2077@riseup.net>
 <5613afa1a339f26dbaaec7bac784f781@openmailbox.org>
 <550760BF.1050000@gmail.com> <55076BB7.9090508@hireahit.com>
 <CAD2Ti28ksYfoYhKLCqDeiXGC2nUEquSrrcOxmgE72AoedKNOug@mail.gmail.com>
 <550876E7.4050206@hireahit.com> 
Message-Id: <20150317195127.326BBE0451@smtp.hushmail.com>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Are webmail providers biased against Tor?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> If you'd quote properly instead of cutting the context [...]

To  put it bluntly. I read what you typed and saw a justification for 
blocking tor. Whether you actually ascribe to the tactic is beside the
 point. You typed: if I have no reason to accept tor on my server then
 blocking it makes sense, yes? Using tor shouldn't be a matter of
acceptable traffic: yes/no, block justified. 

> What I did say is [...]

Based on being lumped in with the bad it makes sense to justify some
servers may block tor?

> That's just the nature of the game.

Your privacy and anonymity online may be a game but for others it's a
serious concern. It would stand to reason that any justification for
blocking tor would offend.

The context of the response appears accurate.

--leeroy
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

