Delivery-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:53:35 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073081E08A3
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF10342BA;
	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A410E342AF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:53:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id cH3Wn-qJUWVy for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:53:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vincent.hireahit.com (vincent.hireahit.com [23.19.120.58])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EEB33F4F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:53:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VINCENT.hireahit.com by hireahit.com (vincent.hireahit.com)
 (SecurityGateway 3.0.2) with ESMTP id SG001780151.MSG 
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=hireahit.com;
 s=MD-20140321; t=1426618090; x=1427222890; q=dns/txt; h=Message-ID:
 Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
 In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=kje79CQaP
 C5RWTYxoVwLkkCwDkCr44ClbTMeibbfY8c=; b=g1osqJMfVhp2xntpCQXAQu61f
 0s1koqc9nt3F4CNXBurKGzeaSBHCV4PxdQAI1UHaIB9F3NKCMJFQvwgUaefP3BQ2
 F/uEGXmgaOj0O8o6uK1fUALvnk3asTYJOtZS1VzsQxRF1vVTYEUtL/lJIfFaFnmT
 xHd/OnWJdfeP3K7LsM=
Received: from [x.x.x.x] (184.68.44.226) by VINCENT.hireahit.com (23.19.120.58)
 (Cipher TLSv1:AES-SHA:256) (MDaemon PRO v15.0.0) 
 with ESMTPSA id 24-md50000017683.msg for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:09 -0700
X-MDRemoteIP: 184.68.44.226
X-MDArrival-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:09 -0700
X-Authenticated-Sender: davew@hireahit.com
X-Return-Path: davew@hireahit.com
X-Envelope-From: davew@hireahit.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <550876E7.4050206@hireahit.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:07 -0700
From: Dave Warren <davew@hireahit.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20140623 FossaMail/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <b6cb75245c0c0ec46b713575b96647e1@openmailbox.org>
 <20150316113315.GD2077@riseup.net>
 <5613afa1a339f26dbaaec7bac784f781@openmailbox.org>
 <550760BF.1050000@gmail.com> <55076BB7.9090508@hireahit.com>
 <CAD2Ti28ksYfoYhKLCqDeiXGC2nUEquSrrcOxmgE72AoedKNOug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti28ksYfoYhKLCqDeiXGC2nUEquSrrcOxmgE72AoedKNOug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Are webmail providers biased against Tor?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2015-03-16 21:20, grarpamp wrote:
>> block Tor completely since I don't have any legitimate traffic from Tor.
> This is funny since some of use just spent the entire day
> reading wikipedia, communicating via email, logged in to work,
> talking to friends, donating via bitcoin and generally surfing the web.

If you'd quote properly instead of cutting the context, you'd note that 
I absolutely did not say I block Tor completely, nor was I suggesting 
doing so.

What I did say is that good users GET LUMPED IN WITH THE BAD simply 
because there's no way to tell them apart. That's the whole point of 
Tor, and TBB in particular.

>> it's the fact that a higher percentage of abuse comes from Tor
> Ahem, objective citation as to all tor users please, thank you.

That's the whole point -- Not all Tor users are abusive, but abusers 
tend toward Tor because of the fact that it provides anonymity and human 
shields in one package. That's just the nature of the game. The result 
is that connections from Tor will be treated with suspicion. For 
example, Google will put you through additional validation steps on a 
more regular basis since it can't tell if you are you, or you are some 
other Tor user who borrowed your password.

-- 
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

