Delivery-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:20:24 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A991E0E5F
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:20:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C290F33B5F;
	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:20:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25187336CE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:20:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id UPz4XZuC2uBV for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:20:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C9633535
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:20:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so683896iec.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=/Aj4r8fZdLaEoSpXYcaSyIEXxMRP457t5zgIA1sDrz4=;
 b=0JR0SwJ+PbPrfySV3OWyZSi9BG3/H57NHWtbvk2AEurjyoztlo1juWl1AOgU7nP8hl
 oFP8KIBl6uB98xwxliB+3YQMxq2mFBRTQmoouHm1+58rkX6pCDr+/8ctSD/axgYVJOYJ
 Yd2BKwV3+t+sc4YIGGy/smR6/5sLcv9eYvUqgigMtYOtQzgnyJw9KsDnx1kWlXhFJStx
 EluXptvJg/ohe+Qa4QCBFa2Aov8vVHVWhKhvKGyQ+qn/LnsUa+n7WGU3EUhsykRCq0Ve
 w7HO81L/6XQid1n5CxL27/3xPO90VVU6ycUNiuTa0VAZPxx8wYq5Pc9yt/q9iWGP2JQ7
 ahgQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.93.83 with SMTP id w19mr83482974icm.37.1426566013684;
 Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.104.78 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55076BB7.9090508@hireahit.com>
References: <b6cb75245c0c0ec46b713575b96647e1@openmailbox.org>
 <20150316113315.GD2077@riseup.net>
 <5613afa1a339f26dbaaec7bac784f781@openmailbox.org>
 <550760BF.1050000@gmail.com> <55076BB7.9090508@hireahit.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:20:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti28ksYfoYhKLCqDeiXGC2nUEquSrrcOxmgE72AoedKNOug@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Are webmail providers biased against Tor?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> However, the reality is that the rate of abuse from anonymous sources will

Lol.

> (torexit.dan.me.uk, I think?)

Lol.

> block Tor completely since I don't have any legitimate traffic from Tor.

This is funny since some of use just spent the entire day
reading wikipedia, communicating via email, logged in to work,
talking to friends, donating via bitcoin and generally surfing the web.

> it's the fact that a higher percentage of abuse comes from Tor

Ahem, objective citation as to all tor users please, thank you.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

