Delivery-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:24:47 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F9D1E0502
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB3C33E45;
	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579EF33BFF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id OzHp3kYzBskx for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3299433B75
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ignm3 with SMTP id m3so30590704ign.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=QxVSFyRUUeMZRYb2DODVzN0C7/FnuUW6GxhU2roQQ2Y=;
 b=HfJ6pytMguKhxEMradP73n0I3iUdo33QXCiNlzgCgc7ZiT/bgQQgIfHFiWAiosu/VI
 HNU7XTkac7ICLDx/Vz9dlItCbchxXq5VRwiOGBhUE6bmqSulflJ+gzauK1alVonY/HzZ
 n/A+gJ/pSFX8K2gpkCPKM7I92z/dKnfOyNS+4RizjDh97ssMldFifiLZ25v/0Vzbj9EO
 +UOPdjQVWlYvzijnqmJ8MqJCcBqizDBAvUKdYnVyd8i4ZUHfXQ+26JfRVHBcqYhK5jP1
 hAh5VSgtBHxxWGyk+LOuoS7WE1+u2uY2OjYE6RVS/UDsj0P/ukIvoQpvXIC1EhlEFKXJ
 dbdw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.89.72 with SMTP id f8mr54316138icm.24.1426505076985; Mon,
 16 Mar 2015 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.0.84 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABMkiz7a2XzNrgeiCfWSWs12aX9u2=k2VQm-4Rq4NJEAecbZ2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b6cb75245c0c0ec46b713575b96647e1@openmailbox.org>
 <CABMkiz7a2XzNrgeiCfWSWs12aX9u2=k2VQm-4Rq4NJEAecbZ2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:24:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CALddkbrMfbS14LTgHMgZSeQgOqnRswbMxwHC2k9aHpLyJm339Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dominik Ungar <domi3821@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Are webmail providers biased against Tor?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

There are proxies where you don't need to verify yourself.
Tor should be a normal thing, sure it's anonymizing but it can help a lot.

2015-03-16 12:12 GMT+01:00 Ben Tasker <ben@bentasker.co.uk>:

> You'll likely see the same thing from anything that the provider considers
> to be an anonymous proxy - i.e. it'll affect Tor exits but isn't
> necessarily Tor specific.
>
> It's reasonably normal, if somewhat irritating
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:52 AM, <blobby@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that when I try to login to my Gmail or Hotmail accounts
> > with Tor, I invariably get asked to validate myself (e.g. receive an
> SMS).
> > This is understandably due my IP being in a different country from the
> > "usual" IPs that I use to sign in.
> >
> > However, I have experimented with StrictExitNodes. I am in New York and
> > have used a number of New York exit nodes. I still get asked to verify.
> >
> > I am wondering if Tor developers or experienced users know (for a fact)
> > whether or not this is "normal" or whether using an exit node
> automatically
> > makes Gmail and Hotmail think that a "hacker" is attempting to access the
> > accounts.
> >
> > This is not a case of a website e.g. Craigslist blocking Tor. It is
> > whether the use of an exit node IP automatically engenders scrutiny from
> > whatever security algorithms certain webmail providers use.
> >
> >
> > --
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ben Tasker
> https://www.bentasker.co.uk
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

