Delivery-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:44:24 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5CC1E0BCA
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:44:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A0634404;
	Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:44:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C6F343F5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:44:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 0UhyEs4DNCjW for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:44:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1093D343FE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:44:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so15467703iec.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=ZquhHJuF+jeah7hecWuKPBqJo6n4U1WrVo0iwvkkdiQ=;
 b=tMQnmzN5drNHPewiXoRPn9mv1zi+BO7loiqNelnGDq4kERvIcHphzq7j2sLBXxi8we
 /0bZ5fY+gGGPrZLMtdXSOr9uVmml2oniXY8i7VZnz9XA2Rdq8rhF1gSCLgLaPvt3Lkza
 SBItTceABVSKxhsgtqaRauRh7dTQb7ULNIQoNgBBIjnBbhuccFLOGa0XZLd4/yCzfHc+
 WKF9sCgeyaewHHSSyK9SXkezmxY2J79zRmxorH3+l2N1qUJvP5P5pSur02jRhA0S7LuR
 GGZgUJ719zUkO3r0WJcvy9dmWQpk5EB5twl6RiipYqkv5aCy1m3ji0JukeMIrUtTLpZK
 Y2DQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.93.83 with SMTP id w19mr45875378icm.37.1426135449819;
 Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.104.78 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55009782.2040004@riseup.net>
References: <A6DD5B99-8E6D-4B21-AC82-14E92C8C6332@maclemon.at>
 <55009782.2040004@riseup.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:44:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2_Xdo1Akedmf7svcCJDEa6OijdMpWD7RsdOs8Ufuyycaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Load Balancing/High Availability Hidden Services
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Thomas White <thomaswhite@riseup.net> wrote:
> particular one won't effect others and also split the web page loads
> between several HS addresses and it won't be very noticeable to the user.

Yes, farming off even static pages at random right from the first
entry point page would further diffuse the load if needed and lead
to random bookmarks (which might be acceptable).
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

