Delivery-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:37:51 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44CA21E0312;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 17:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0036DE087A;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 21:37:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD35E0850
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 21:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id leI2btVV79np for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  5 Jun 2016 21:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12266E07CA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 21:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p34so34394158qgp.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=s6f2//7kcIGPItzP+XxevGKo520W/7kvTOOxcqkEAYw=;
 b=tkz0G7iHrFcm9Uf35UCQWwZH5hj6gZ8wUh1yAZUS/1WS71Y9lC0DgGcHqP4SAWg26b
 412WV60lPq2ZpGCsi5CxaW/3vj21MQ6LWI0WoTF49mky3pItvfZOZ274i1RiNMFtzHAA
 UBD1EDPdfJb+8qf7MJ47hnBiUV69C5AlA/PCsFORqmnmUDjbT+39COrdCBj/xKJbT7RN
 s3h9FsGgshGM2ybySZt8EIWj9GWo9yXu7qro+QcsMmdsLZBUJ1Fg3EC/CRAIKWm8XWZ5
 B0JsZFihLwVmVGEmcU5jIMocggTA+i3AV676g3KA40E3KxN3v2OS8XkQxZNlLqs2TPAK
 xQow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=s6f2//7kcIGPItzP+XxevGKo520W/7kvTOOxcqkEAYw=;
 b=BtZUurDDKnV+25ruYU7Wb1mzyalAdPbgtDh/dLlCiLpAqDYvyoVzsiwyrJTZT7gaUQ
 p70bkie3AhH1FR65DvMbO7SXD/KhD9imamcOYnxZNEVgYaWqTPL8Pm+qc7G9fvjekNGp
 qcWE993qXs4SWv8DxGM8dMqcqUjOEka+vermjvBxfE5YQut7PRqRssPSDZOfp9K7K0Bw
 r/8DV6j3VDFGoVBukJL83qY8KYfJIWFbYymeKxmbk6zNunlqX9Cmfc/wppuNQW+k3Hcw
 YGdBK8KeTQyF3OQ9WGdg4uCc26Kpbic7UC3n0Cl0TZyF4E8ytpO5HMvOek2M6zT9nGkc
 xe0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJwtVx7C92NF/mZXeaSzVWm8uoGd06jP8pmHpZQ1uyeNv3PJS+xvcU3c69mNs+u1g==
X-Received: by 10.140.98.172 with SMTP id o41mr708474qge.8.1465162658074;
 Sun, 05 Jun 2016 14:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (host228.190-229-66.telecom.net.ar. [190.229.66.228])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 i34sm4186478qgd.2.2016.06.05.14.37.36
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sun, 05 Jun 2016 14:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <57549ba1.25538c0a.6cdf7.5e5c@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:37:38 -0300
From: juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <6439b26156f03f3f6a51e170b5b9fbe3@riseup.net>
References: <8554176B-F17B-4FC6-AFBA-29DA392E4B28@riseup.net>
 <CAD2Ti29UX8dZxz_McuC8GAaigWXgeAbWZR=QZBDfhLLP7Y_RtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6439b26156f03f3f6a51e170b5b9fbe3@riseup.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] A possible solution to traffic correlation attacks,
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:13:41 -0400
notfriendly@riseup.net wrote:


> So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits
> the network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after
> received or another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder
> to correlate the traffic right?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mix_network

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

