Delivery-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:12:36 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2881E02CA;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:12:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6C6E15ED;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A04E15DD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:12:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id TDRSgksWWYRh for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:12:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com
 [61.9.168.140])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate",
 Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA8EE15A5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:12:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nskntcmgw06p ([61.9.169.166]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com
 with ESMTP
 id <20160611101217.FUWE2042.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw06p>
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:12:17 +0000
Received: from x220a02 ([121.220.43.228]) by nskntcmgw06p with BigPond Outbound
 id 5NCE1t0054vNbUx01NCFf9; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:12:17 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=WO39rwQR c=1 sm=1
 a=yWkCi3BMLgpGmn5ydydGqQ==:17 a=pD_ry4oyNxEA:10 a=PJXswgZ-jfXTT-9HPrYA:9
 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yWkCi3BMLgpGmn5ydydGqQ==:117
Received: by x220a02 (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 57EEE26003F; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:10:34 +1000 (AEST)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:10:34 +1000
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20160611101034.GB1224@x220-a02>
References: <13c12743-0038-b4f9-e697-a771606570fe@beroal.in.ua>
 <575AC9A5.7010602@gmail.com> <575AD1F9.5040607@riseup.net>
 <575BB984.9080505@cock.li>
 <9191214f-4eb1-00e3-fdfd-9d182dab2ddd@mail.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9191214f-4eb1-00e3-fdfd-9d182dab2ddd@mail.ru>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Please filter "Appelbaum"!!!!!
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:47:34PM +0300, 4torlist2 wrote:
> Tired of reading bullsh*t about Appelbaum! If he did what it is said, should

> In my mail program I setup a filter on the word "Appelbaum", messages with
> it are automatically trashed. But that should have been done by the Tor-List
> admins at the list level!

Bzzt. Nope. Shouldn't happen, won't happen, would be rejected by many, if
it did happen it would result in a new 'uncensored' list being created.


> Censorship is sometimes necessary, sorry to have
> to say this, when some ass*oles by their stupid attitude in fact attack the
> whole Tor system.

Your humble opinion is noted. Not gonna happen (not that I'm a list admin,
but I'm pretty sure you'd lose a lot of the list if you did). At best you
would open a massive and endless ongoing debate every single time
something contentious shows up; this would destroy this list as I
understand the intention of this list.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

