Delivery-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:24:53 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53291E02A6;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:24:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24D6E1576;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:24:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3652E1546
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:24:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id YM69d2lgVhwF for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:24:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8A3E0FB4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:24:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.163])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B511A1DDF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465633447; bh=brgHznL5kCzst8W9gq8uu9CNIwXvSbu1Uy1qZWZHOy4=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=s2nHO5W8F4TKUyO5NgXDfihnv8KrZ2CShJ0sfJVUpVkOX8pMtHRDwWFJvjYlKOcpM
 SiifJyYlLIsc/wQgNJcVNyPi5+5tdlgSdf9WRT1TnkX5VF7N+FgO0KQfWE+1PKLdtk
 B+iu4aNmt+ITWhMafyTZkxraxw70j5WlQgW6Sb1s=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id 65B291C0070
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <13c12743-0038-b4f9-e697-a771606570fe@beroal.in.ua>
 <575AC9A5.7010602@gmail.com> <575AD1F9.5040607@riseup.net>
 <575BB984.9080505@cock.li>
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1210
Message-ID: <575BCAA3.6040602@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 02:24:03 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <575BB984.9080505@cock.li>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Can we have less of Jacob Appelbaum here, please?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/11/2016 01:11 AM, ncl@cock.li wrote:
> Mirimir:
>> I'd say that conspiracies among Tor Project employees and
>> volunteers to force out and humiliate a key employee would be a
>> serious matter, with obvious impact on Tor development. So it's
>> not just Jacob's behavior that must be reviewed. It's also the
>> behavior of the lynch mob. And anyone who behaved dishonestly
>> and/or recklessly in this matter needs to resign. There's no
>> place in Tor Project for rapists. But there's also no place there
>> for lynch mobs.
> 
> Nearly every thread in the past week on this ml has been on this
> topic. Some of these posts are honestly the most stupid things I've
> read on this list, posts whose only worth is to mock for the sheer
> awfulness of them.

No dispute there. Unless you mean mine ;)

> Surely we can calm it with the specula at least?

I'm suspicious by nature. And the more I learn about this mess, the
more suspicious I get.

> And keep to a few threads rather than making a new one for every
> little subtopic of the subject?

Hey, I haven't posted about that separation agreement on Cryptome ;)

> I mean look, you have me posting in a meta thread now.

Me too, but hey ...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXW8qhAAoJEGINZVEXwuQ+n/wH/1FMRMPhg/YWZWy9fmeFhei6
ERdeNB9pKtB8V7XU1iPCSHxfzRDQeaNosMqvwSNh6ZX/kgcH0reutsh0f2hpRh2I
w2Bp36oag5RG6StlR1YuGVGp/+VRa4nE3I8vfHaQG6SltcXUjJkk5FKzF3YpsGeM
M9mzBYj8QXBL6WcyVErb3F+IAUKheyCTQwxAx4gWB/J2KIh1tSVfPPQNBIRi5Tyy
eFFMe9pgkQyikR4KMk6kuM5qOxDcZne76XWI5x4H+esar3aaSh3UAVhVL+uzsztM
d4z2OxoG2L9seQyCIlqvMnZCRIRNqgvx9rgRFi0hvJhq7WBBlwTcjudBLZ2QuzM=
=E2Hx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

