Delivery-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:11:33 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270B31E0B56;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:11:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D521DE1581;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:11:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE82E1538
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9urGDfeImGdN for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cock.li (cock.li [185.100.85.212])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B615E1058
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:11:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <13c12743-0038-b4f9-e697-a771606570fe@beroal.in.ua>
 <575AC9A5.7010602@gmail.com> <575AD1F9.5040607@riseup.net>
From: "ncl@cock.li" <ncl@cock.li>
Message-ID: <575BB984.9080505@cock.li>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:11:00 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <575AD1F9.5040607@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Can we have less of Jacob Appelbaum here, please?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Mirimir:
> I'd say that conspiracies among Tor Project employees and volunteers
> to force out and humiliate a key employee would be a serious matter,
> with obvious impact on Tor development. So it's not just Jacob's
> behavior that must be reviewed. It's also the behavior of the lynch
> mob. And anyone who behaved dishonestly and/or recklessly in this
> matter needs to resign. There's no place in Tor Project for rapists.
> But there's also no place there for lynch mobs.

Nearly every thread in the past week on this ml has been on this topic.
Some of these posts are honestly the most stupid things I've read on
this list, posts whose only worth is to mock for the sheer awfulness of
them.
Surely we can calm it with the specula at least? And keep to a few
threads rather than making a new one for every little subtopic of the
subject?
I mean look, you have me posting in a meta thread now.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

