Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:24:20 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766341E094D;
	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8716EE14DF;
	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEB0E14F3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id EdcytPQccj9m for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF00DE1401
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D37F1A278D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:24 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465572204; bh=6wk0anzwu2ve9HstYd1ybwGjwXEqk9jJXKLma+/pmHs=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=JeeXzoXzYwtmIGLE37I+OeYtk9tizgntvqouLHt6uV/xzxO66RZUJTkD6SMtEgqMi
 zBraeP5wonz+JVcE69lo1/T5rzEA0TpDdjFsnAcRTgNJzY99SKd+rYHlSwdNMX4ytQ
 7zEH+JbBPMW7XUl+kc/2H3CeyqpGStxb8gUk505I=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: df)
 with ESMTPSA id 3AB48400AE
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <13c12743-0038-b4f9-e697-a771606570fe@beroal.in.ua>
 <575AC9A5.7010602@gmail.com> <575AD1F9.5040607@riseup.net>
From: "df." <df@riseup.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <575ADB64.3040401@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:16 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <575AD1F9.5040607@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Can we have less of Jacob Appelbaum here, please?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


Agreed Mirimir, it is VERY difficult to avoid or ignore talking about
someone who at the time of there collaboration with the tor project was
allegedly involved in some type of "sexual misconduct".

Just for the record:
Actually I asked 5 days ago, on this list, I asked with all due respect
if we could "just move on to other topics" the reason was because I
thought all the comments that were being made were out of line and not
very constructive. Why did no one follow suite then? How convenient now
that all the Appelbaum bashing has taken place, the real facts come out
they are all now tired.

I just ignored much of it. If someone else is tired the might be lazy
for simply filtering or just deleting threads they do not like, another
option is that they could also just unsubscribe and go to sleep.


Mirimir:
> On 06/10/2016 08:07 AM, Kevin wrote:
>> Yes indeed.  I mean, it is important but is this the correct forum
>> to go on and on about such things?  If it is, I will retract my
>> statement.
> 
> "This mailing list is for all discussion about theory, design, and
> development of Onion Routing."
> 
> I'd say that conspiracies among Tor Project employees and volunteers
> to force out and humiliate a key employee would be a serious matter,
> with obvious impact on Tor development. So it's not just Jacob's
> behavior that must be reviewed. It's also the behavior of the lynch
> mob. And anyone who behaved dishonestly and/or recklessly in this
> matter needs to resign. There's no place in Tor Project for rapists.
> But there's also no place there for lynch mobs.
> 
>> On 6/10/2016 4:39 AM, me@beroal.in.ua wrote:
>>> Hello, people. Sincerely, I'm tired of this flood of threads.
> 
> So hey, just delete what you don't like.
> 
>> --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>> software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

