Delivery-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 14:40:03 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50711E0842;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2016 14:40:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A89E0ED4;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:39:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B25E0EC8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:39:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id FCVhSbqQr0JC for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:39:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from u1.1gb.ua (smtp-1.1gb.com.ua [195.234.4.10])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CDEE0C6B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Spooler by u1.1gb.ua (Mercury/32 v4.52) ID MO00A213;
 9 Jun 2016 21:39:52 +0300
Received: from spooler by mail-u1-robots.in-solve.hidden (Mercury/32 v4.52);
 9 Jun 2016 21:39:49 +0300
Received: from ul1.1gb.ua (195.234.4.24) by smtp-1.1gb.com.ua (Mercury/32
 v4.52) with ESMTP ID MG00A20F; 9 Jun 2016 21:39:45 +0300
Received: from [192.162.141.53] ([192.162.141.53]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by ul1.1gb.ua (8.14.9/8.14.0) with ESMTP id u59Idi6V024973
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:39:45 +0300
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20160609160905.64CFCE0B12@eugeni.torproject.org>
From: me@beroal.in.ua
Message-ID: <b48a1d94-2aad-a561-5aec-74def157394c@beroal.in.ua>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:39:44 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160609160905.64CFCE0B12@eugeni.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Browserprint fingerprinting website
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I am still unique. :-)

TBB version | 3 | 134.33 | 6.0.1

The TBB version was updated automatically.


On 09.06.16 19:08, cube@browserprint.info wrote:
> I have left the tests in, but excluded them from the fingerprint uniqueness calculation.
> I've also grayed them out and made it clear that the tests have problems.
>
>> I zoom and change window size often, and they are reset when the browser
>> starts. I think they rather prevent tracking me. But your site tells
>> that my fingerprint is unique because of them. Maybe, exclude those
>> parameters?
>>
>>
>> On 07.06.16 07:04, cube wrote:
>>> Yes, the TBB and IceCat handle screen size calculations in a way
>>> different to most browsers.
>>> This results in odd screen sizes and screen sizes that can be affected
>>> by zooming.
>>> I wasn't aware that the character sizes test was also affected by
>>> zooming (this seems to be the case on even regular browsers), thanks for
>>> pointing that out.
>>> I'm also concerned that you got "nullxnull" for your CSS screen size
>>> test, I guess that means the test is bugged.
>>>
>>> On 07/06/16 07:38, me@beroal.in.ua wrote:
>>>> Hi. I pushed the "fingerprint me" button.
>>>>
>>>> Browser Characteristic | Number of occurrences | one in x browsers
>>>> have this value | value
>>>> Screen Size and Colour Depth | 1 | 217 | 583x467x24
>>>>
>>>> It seems that this parameter depends on the zoom, as well as
>>>> "Character Sizes".
>>>>
>>>> On 06.06.16 14:47, cube@browserprint.info wrote:
>>>>> Hello, I'm the creator of a new fingerprinting website,
>>>>> https://browserprint.info
>>>>> Think Panopticlick but with a lot more tests.
>>>>> Many of the tests are even designed specifically to catch the Tor
>>>>> browser bundle out, for instance the Math/Tan function returns a
>>>>> different value based on what your underlying operating system is, so
>>>>> it's easy to detect when a browser is lying in their user-agent string.
>>>>> I would greatly appreciate if you visit the site and fingerprint
>>>>> yourselves since it will help me refine the techniques and improve
>>>>> the site.
>>>>> I'm adding more tests every week and if you have any ideas or
>>>>> suggestions I'd love to hear them.
>> -- 
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>
>>
>>

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

