Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:31:15 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279491E0B81;
	Tue,  7 Jun 2016 14:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C3EE0DDF;
	Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:31:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB58E0D82
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:30:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id S3pSrhY_HQIw for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:30:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EADA5E0D07
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:30:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id p204so95204768oih.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=YnsKhJdKbFprMc3zdcGNt+IKQsmztrPsTxRgMy/a2hM=;
 b=TJkFKGcTpwnRkOdhBOVg93B5OR1NjgalzSSrYYFuKICPUaQEGWeiuPyDfV6+tn64/X
 ZPZGAnyj7R2jC5vfCZ+bx2h4fkExPK5Tg7F86Ddh/g9UxSlGBex2fDfoD0dEqnypun6u
 AziKcnB/CvDkNfTU4REFsuGCZ5zk/rWYvhKoMahe2/2+0t5ssbgeeBQhvCIkqpjzTNXF
 LEtYeaaqyo9FrnDpzqoZlfis+idPGKI39ObhOwwVYHDos3KDXcxUujAylmIyjUT+gIHk
 u0JUXEWHBeR83nWcmPUTpYgrtF9Npbf+H5Uz3cBAgyYeDm0KipZNrEHfmoKtllAQ7c4U
 nTZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=YnsKhJdKbFprMc3zdcGNt+IKQsmztrPsTxRgMy/a2hM=;
 b=gudTxlZMKXEErExwvNckkYu/OCHVwvvSwv4TOJjXTV6gg/ZSeq/X8JyLoM6SqWfqK/
 ij/AcqTJQ4EotN4rzBwNSA+qb4iqfB3phUGDng2McA2jHb5FO9fNae+1pJ2uq6xhYt9X
 dG/Fwg4xtLFh5JmvzESQtDUf0DGS5nq+ZmNGejelGysjRo+Tyel+twNVnOO3Aque+nkq
 DUbKBUZZeRQIpOgGJtN8Z9e47iUUCMsJxheul+MskbmwHyMrRhvFCg5CLrX2hZ9+ky+2
 gFp4cqLme/eYbJeqvyJDla9ev5bS3J6Ysa5FnEMLbSCc1/58EjUWS6FItno5Qh3AJzSy
 SvgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLVbzXLr121dns1QT0oIetGRIL4HJpQLtf19S8MgiLkhTWpRDah9z3oIqLtmZvqhIm4xJ40KAq/hJwtrQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.93.65 with SMTP id r62mr572626oib.182.1465324253854;
 Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.11.91 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7d0669b87c4e9888ee1672080c33a5c0@riseup.net>
References: <bfd85298d1c9a42cc9f3945c11a7679f@cock.lu>
 <132a0399ed4081a3f70d6027ca3e97cc@riseup.net>
 <9fc6224a-fd13-5887-62b5-7bb7fafe6787@cajuntechie.org>
 <7d0669b87c4e9888ee1672080c33a5c0@riseup.net>
From: Rick Evans <tmovoice@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:30:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMYxE2uHbtmG+Q8zUsQb6HfWuGd7V5Zhve_=d1hpwg0ob1uZEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Could be Tor is not a honey pot, maybe it is Tar Baby.

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Not Friendly <notfriendly@riseup.net> wrote:

> On 2016-06-07 13:48, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 6/7/2016 12:13 PM, Not Friendly wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-06-07 02:35, aaa@cock.lu wrote:
>>>
>>>> First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force
>>>> for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the
>>>> blue haired problem glasses brigade. Then they start modifying
>>>> their community guidelines to appease their new members, probably
>>>> under the guise that it's to prevent evil sexist MRAs from
>>>> "harassing" (read: disagreeing with) their new SJW friends. Then
>>>> the SJWs decide prominent members of the project need to be
>>>> cyber lynched so they can take over. "Jacob once farted in the
>>>> same elevator as me, it was literally rape!
>>>> #FireHimOrTorIsRapists" "Jacob once disagreed with me, it was a
>>>> legitimate death threat that made me fear for my life!
>>>> #FireHimOrTorWantsToKillAllWomen" "He once mentioned playing a
>>>> video game, I knew he was a gamergater! Damn misogynist hates
>>>> women! #KillAllWhiteMen" Then Tor loses their best spokesman. The
>>>> SJWs and their friends fill the now empty jobs and repeat the
>>>> process until they're the only ones with power over the project.
>>>> Then Tor dies, since the only "work" that gets done is virtue
>>>> signalling on Twitter.
>>>>
>>>> It's only a matter of time before they eat Nick or Roger.
>>>>
>>>> RIP Jacob. RIP Tor.
>>>>
>>>> Usually I get a lot of schadenfreude from watching idiots
>>>> destroy themselves like this, but Tor is close to my heart so I'm
>>>> quite sad. The NSA has won.
>>>>
>>> I'm unsure how "Tor" has in anyway died. The network is still
>>> secure. They only thing that happened is that a former member of
>>> the Tor Project has bad publicity. I'm unsure how that makes Tor
>>> dead.
>>>
>>
>> It doesn't. The Tor haters never miss an opportunity to declare Tor
>> "dead". "Oh! It's Tuesday! RIP Tor!". It's often the same crowd (or
>> associates of them) that love to declare Tor a honeypot for the
>> federal government.
>>
>> Anyway, I'm just wondering when this list move beyond the recent
>> sensationalism and back to actually discussing Tor.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVwkBAAoJEAKK33RTsEsV2KoP/jIYjETr/cuuhMPwMi5K2VLD
>> GpOWuTyV7r8GiXa8mU5ioUgIFyCMRKZOsiu4mOIyVi7hxVlqx2CQFMq8uEgEzUBf
>> toURRsPgFCWQlkHCp+Rh13YyB1U6nWTPWZ37hWweSvW694fI/4jNct/B0lWHjBFw
>> fYHzVoG0oHi3IdlT3jNQHet0KhUZ4z1pBIxgZeE9LloZ9jBMFvU6zEP7LzEas/7i
>> tOuUjhPjMrpbmru0m/Cz5utDtmew3B2g8AxbNE8Wjdb40LcGut2Nd/8ID12ucxXY
>> PS93DsAuC+j4kC00JvnlUSW5NfNG6+LgTjt7b94mGL2SxiF5txUfemaJT6AUr4iJ
>> 5y4qSlBOSLnVscDF18WkzRtrknYsMK5OJ4yza6ty4/TewHju8+qdi6R7Z0dUxrqN
>> E95HwxffvIYfwxhVIsZ0oPd52a9E6UgRXE8C3KdynmZtQcWSU0hZDfIxzMGxm+MM
>> 8DLB58sjw2aW+Y+qhVh9fUXtRV5LRYZpiQy3gzvKIp1ayzLgh8RN4DLvQXvhAvPR
>> JMniTNhZ+Ifv8dFeueqQ+JUouCbGfg3YUmZNWe7AeR4updb26JdL5EjHhswp2OQE
>> F57tWgNvFhmkW1lTBEaOZq9MCE9RlO71BOQmPgAz/+HbmEFA1DnFzjx0zcoIJfrS
>> p5oWLw4D1ZHJbMq5UL/7
>> =In7+
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
> I do not understand why those people think that Tor is a honeypot by the
> federal government. It is OPEN SOURCE. If you are by any means worried look
> at the source code and compile it manually. There is no hiding a backdoor.
> Unless every relay operator is helping the federal government (which at
> that point the information would leak) then there isn't a way to backdoor
> Tor. I don't understand why people do not take the time to research things.
>
> --
> Not Friendly
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

