Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:13:11 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04DCE1E0678;
	Tue,  7 Jun 2016 14:13:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A44E0E42;
	Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:12:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5384AE0E11
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id sYkklSRGpVpZ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E3BE0AF9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:12:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D521A2A6C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 18:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465323163; bh=HIv3J1kwDNtiUZMewxhD4wJPJykIdemzKB/3BsCeD1E=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=N4AMRJaWoQ66xouheE2y+3T1qMrLUenkkTlHyqGlTTCNODCSQHJIaP5v80pdcrbx1
 8qIqyv3h+Ska2TxBb8RPJPgQj8hHGDYpUki/ErXWXTt4zSLJ7ArEXBP1IrwNiArI51
 WBECTZeSWWDVHUBITayx91EiuUmlbyFDBVSfpFPE=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: notfriendly) with ESMTPSA id 1A98F4019D
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:12:43 -0400
From: Not Friendly <notfriendly@riseup.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <9fc6224a-fd13-5887-62b5-7bb7fafe6787@cajuntechie.org>
References: <bfd85298d1c9a42cc9f3945c11a7679f@cock.lu>
 <132a0399ed4081a3f70d6027ca3e97cc@riseup.net>
 <9fc6224a-fd13-5887-62b5-7bb7fafe6787@cajuntechie.org>
Message-ID: <7d0669b87c4e9888ee1672080c33a5c0@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-06-07 13:48, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 6/7/2016 12:13 PM, Not Friendly wrote:
>> On 2016-06-07 02:35, aaa@cock.lu wrote:
>>> First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force
>>> for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the
>>> blue haired problem glasses brigade. Then they start modifying
>>> their community guidelines to appease their new members, probably
>>> under the guise that it's to prevent evil sexist MRAs from
>>> "harassing" (read: disagreeing with) their new SJW friends. Then
>>> the SJWs decide prominent members of the project need to be
>>> cyber lynched so they can take over. "Jacob once farted in the
>>> same elevator as me, it was literally rape!
>>> #FireHimOrTorIsRapists" "Jacob once disagreed with me, it was a
>>> legitimate death threat that made me fear for my life!
>>> #FireHimOrTorWantsToKillAllWomen" "He once mentioned playing a
>>> video game, I knew he was a gamergater! Damn misogynist hates
>>> women! #KillAllWhiteMen" Then Tor loses their best spokesman. The
>>> SJWs and their friends fill the now empty jobs and repeat the
>>> process until they're the only ones with power over the project.
>>> Then Tor dies, since the only "work" that gets done is virtue
>>> signalling on Twitter.
>>> 
>>> It's only a matter of time before they eat Nick or Roger.
>>> 
>>> RIP Jacob. RIP Tor.
>>> 
>>> Usually I get a lot of schadenfreude from watching idiots
>>> destroy themselves like this, but Tor is close to my heart so I'm
>>> quite sad. The NSA has won.
>> I'm unsure how "Tor" has in anyway died. The network is still
>> secure. They only thing that happened is that a former member of
>> the Tor Project has bad publicity. I'm unsure how that makes Tor
>> dead.
> 
> It doesn't. The Tor haters never miss an opportunity to declare Tor
> "dead". "Oh! It's Tuesday! RIP Tor!". It's often the same crowd (or
> associates of them) that love to declare Tor a honeypot for the
> federal government.
> 
> Anyway, I'm just wondering when this list move beyond the recent
> sensationalism and back to actually discussing Tor.
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVwkBAAoJEAKK33RTsEsV2KoP/jIYjETr/cuuhMPwMi5K2VLD
> GpOWuTyV7r8GiXa8mU5ioUgIFyCMRKZOsiu4mOIyVi7hxVlqx2CQFMq8uEgEzUBf
> toURRsPgFCWQlkHCp+Rh13YyB1U6nWTPWZ37hWweSvW694fI/4jNct/B0lWHjBFw
> fYHzVoG0oHi3IdlT3jNQHet0KhUZ4z1pBIxgZeE9LloZ9jBMFvU6zEP7LzEas/7i
> tOuUjhPjMrpbmru0m/Cz5utDtmew3B2g8AxbNE8Wjdb40LcGut2Nd/8ID12ucxXY
> PS93DsAuC+j4kC00JvnlUSW5NfNG6+LgTjt7b94mGL2SxiF5txUfemaJT6AUr4iJ
> 5y4qSlBOSLnVscDF18WkzRtrknYsMK5OJ4yza6ty4/TewHju8+qdi6R7Z0dUxrqN
> E95HwxffvIYfwxhVIsZ0oPd52a9E6UgRXE8C3KdynmZtQcWSU0hZDfIxzMGxm+MM
> 8DLB58sjw2aW+Y+qhVh9fUXtRV5LRYZpiQy3gzvKIp1ayzLgh8RN4DLvQXvhAvPR
> JMniTNhZ+Ifv8dFeueqQ+JUouCbGfg3YUmZNWe7AeR4updb26JdL5EjHhswp2OQE
> F57tWgNvFhmkW1lTBEaOZq9MCE9RlO71BOQmPgAz/+HbmEFA1DnFzjx0zcoIJfrS
> p5oWLw4D1ZHJbMq5UL/7
> =In7+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I do not understand why those people think that Tor is a honeypot by the 
federal government. It is OPEN SOURCE. If you are by any means worried 
look at the source code and compile it manually. There is no hiding a 
backdoor. Unless every relay operator is helping the federal government 
(which at that point the information would leak) then there isn't a way 
to backdoor Tor. I don't understand why people do not take the time to 
research things.

-- 
Not Friendly
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

