Delivery-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:23:32 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41F21E085E;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 10:23:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD91E0B5C;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 14:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9189E0B31
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 14:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id arYALOJJJ4gO for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  6 Jun 2016 14:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F4A9E0B27
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 14:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.163])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642171A050B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 14:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465222978; bh=mdgUKoMwXjbkB43oWVzA8uwgvoCR+Jj5FjYwaM2vQ68=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=eaMumHQ9bK2g59kqEUhi5fv9Vg4yAS4Qz3GulrNkQQO5I/1Sayny1nm699ypNGbYV
 6SDxp3A+adlrLSQu+XnHudQHr7zo0LGXZQczJCYgqR+SCKvK+63dEPoQd9TZ+DnjDw
 Byug6xEEuWZH0lUzXArJsOhX1PhAh2D+4ct427cw=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: notfriendly) with ESMTPSA id 3E76C1C0019
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:22:54 -0400
From: Not Friendly <notfriendly@riseup.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <6f5da4602695b90648854ded0f2dbdf6@cryptolab.net>
References: <969339847.468867.1465173853861.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail08.arcor-online.net>
 <575569D1.7090806@sonsorol.org>
 <6f5da4602695b90648854ded0f2dbdf6@cryptolab.net>
Message-ID: <e7b1bace569828177159b8c647fedadf@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Any updates from Tor Project on ioerror?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-06-06 09:58, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Chris Dagdigian wrote:
>> It's sorta disgusting to see the creep defenders come out in force on
>> this list - especially the ones who talk big about anti-establishment
>> stuff and post anonymously from privacy friendly ISPs who suddenly and
>> magically have decided to start proclaiming their love for the rule of
>> law and the need to stay silent until "real proof and evidence is
>> provided". How convenient.
> 
>   It *is* a bit strange, though not unexpected at this point.  People
> are going to believe what they want to believe, and will lean on the
> lack of police involvement despite the fact that the number of rape
> victims who file a police report is vanishingly small.  Of the couple
> dozen friends and family who've spoken to me about their experiences
> with sexual assault, only one succeeded in prosecution.  Her rapist
> was convicted of "simple assault" (not rape) and got community service
> with no sex offender registration.  For raping a thirteen-year-old
> girl and offering to plead guilty.  Much ink has been spilled on this
> topic, so I won't belabor the point, except to say that this is the
> trend rather than an exceptional case.
> 
>   Interestingly, this logic seems only to apply to rape survivors.  I
> would guess that these same people defend Edward Snowden's decision to
> not go to the police about illegal surveillance practices and instead
> to talk about his experiences.
> 
>   Also, the notion that Tor would be hoodwinked by some
> cointelpro/psyop/conspiracy bollocks is quite insulting.
> 
>> Got my fingers crossed that the more sensible and rational members of
>> this list are staying silent as they often do when the oddballs come
>> to play.
>> 
>> My $.02 of course since everyone else has been so free with theirs
> 
>   Yeah.  These are quite serious allegations and I'm happy that Tor's
> got a legal firm to investigate.  If people take issue with
> investigating claims like these, well, that's unfortunate.
> 
> best,
> Griffin
> 
> 
> --
> {{disclaimer: this is just my opinion and I don't work for Tor or
> represent them in any way}}
At the current point in time no evidence has been provided to prove the 
allegations against Jacob. Until time that such evidence is provided to 
the public I choose to believe that Jacob remains innocent.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

