Delivery-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:36:55 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32A21E0659;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 08:36:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94276E1270;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 12:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5726EE1235
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 12:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id e1WH_PGvAzBJ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  6 Jun 2016 12:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 995BDE108B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 12:36:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z189so41162176itg.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 05:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=bentasker.co.uk; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=QxZ1L7AjThpLWE8Zk6ta8tn8n/irqiY0lxyF4O+ckWk=;
 b=QL59f3I6By3gubTxWXxEf5iX5xQ8gDZ3KQYJ8pV2YX51THZ/YZxFrKyGoeEuAmNVMe
 I0iFzLuIrkmwq9lV+R90GO0Q8lEv87uTBMeU6rbjIHydvqeNJuo15x5oN8+Hbfi91zSv
 8cTWFnj3/c5RvRKSoU+ov+EsJctG6unNBvYe8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=QxZ1L7AjThpLWE8Zk6ta8tn8n/irqiY0lxyF4O+ckWk=;
 b=mLpxLLLWZsvfAu/fYgDu+Z7Ox47j6v/zpQpkJU4xZNFD5AJD70D8mml72vyBxkFChX
 L0IEM543y1GG7pu1T7sfTZdRWKvYxF22rDn45vEt5ujarIRsMwHkm10v/8UKAGbuOA4Q
 i8YNF7PjLqkE8z9Ow7rqKkv6RUaO8IyLyOZHk6glIQ9Uj5FJ/GV8c1BkgjKLF2Ix7s5O
 nx1uzoTnoq16ZniiRo4bMuzUK8+tJcdQhmaSclvfkLYCr6Ie1IKuch5oyUeDqatkdbOL
 JFfS7rrcvNN2rSxX4kc1chYzCFC2+ac9zTlUwwm3h08l03OzJIes2L43J1XbuBoxxsky
 qvig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIJK8Y397+qpo3oFIoiQBFjVQGRV4bUNafmPs57OL4MNSEpnLKPPM6AT062dWTMMzXdVaJA2vJ3XRd1ug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.36.58.81 with SMTP id m78mr7523866itm.95.1465216589346; Mon,
 06 Jun 2016 05:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.30.161 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 05:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [86.168.230.243]
In-Reply-To: <575569D1.7090806@sonsorol.org>
References: <969339847.468867.1465173853861.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail08.arcor-online.net>
 <575569D1.7090806@sonsorol.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:36:29 +0100
Message-ID: <CABMkiz5AH0yY4z9neg=Jh+8NtdwWD7VyDRf0cMQWO-wP+Kp5dQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Tasker <ben@bentasker.co.uk>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Any updates from Tor Project on ioerror?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> who suddenly and magically have decided to start proclaiming their love
for the rule of law and the need to stay silent until "real proof and
evidence is provided".

Dunno about staying silent, but the creation of that website was a long,
long step over the line IMO.

A site in ioerros name containing multiple allegations with no evidence
provided, a somewhat malicious twitter link and no real re-course for an
easily found response. Nothing wrong with that whatsoever /s

But then, it ties into a bugbear I have with how various legal systems
handle this type of accusation. I 100% understand some alleged victims
might want to remain anonymous (in this and other cases). But given the
harm an allegation (even if unfounded) can wreak on it's own, the accused
should similarly be entitled to anonymity up until the point of conviction.

Other than that I don't like how the whole thing has been pursued (if
that's the right word), personally I'm making no judgement - it's not my
place and there's not nearly enough information available to know whether
there's any truth to it anyway. I'm also not particularly inclined to think
that any evidence should be publicly aired, outside of actual legal
proceedings.

FWIW, though, based on a quick read, I can easily see Nick Farr's story
boiling down to an incompatibility in personas/approaches rather than a
deliberate malicious campaign waged against him. Doesn't mean it was/wasn't
the case.



On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Chris Dagdigian <dag@sonsorol.org> wrote:

>
> It's sorta disgusting to see the creep defenders come out in force on this
> list - especially the ones who talk big about anti-establishment stuff and
> post anonymously from privacy friendly ISPs who suddenly and magically have
> decided to start proclaiming their love for the rule of law and the need to
> stay silent until "real proof and evidence is provided". How convenient.
>
> The only sorta good thing is that our little community here appears to
> mirror the tech community at large when it comes to handling claims
> regarding abusive personalities and harassment. The behavior exhibited here
> is the norm, not the exception, minus the tor-specific caveat that
> everything here, always, is a government conspiracy in some way shape or
> form.
>
> Got my fingers crossed that the more sensible and rational members of this
> list are staying silent as they often do when the oddballs come to play.
>
> My $.02 of course since everyone else has been so free with theirs
>
>
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>



-- 
Ben Tasker
https://www.bentasker.co.uk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

