Delivery-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:44:39 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF48D1E007D;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 21:44:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7199E129F;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:44:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B3CE1239
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 1K_Fu52z9jd7 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC302E108A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.163])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70141A1B16
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:44:25 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465177465; bh=eAHSIskus/phzxBVSsols8JnMXqQw06cjdUryjOwIK8=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=iFDnHR+ZUDyy7dHcApAAze2Flqjs10C9rPWuymA46R9vVjJw11ZD4ZEdH0HjWp1or
 rFod2eH/wMhnEB4inczWpvITdTWzVCBK43i5nEWVcbCFlZZ12dqAfrk+3PCKEo223O
 pugH/sD0X28w2eRp3saAaVylYnZbn5Rvxek7qVns=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: notfriendly) with ESMTPSA id 8D0721C01A5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:44:25 -0400
From: notfriendly@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <a9cbf2d2-6b5c-cd66-f587-75209d53bd26@cajuntechie.org>
References: <51c9eb8d-bcfc-cce0-02b8-18c4c544a7de@cajuntechie.org>
 <dc9f4b61575bb70ece1a2b94449910c8@riseup.net>
 <1ae5122a-7654-28e2-1481-65648a7816de@cajuntechie.org>
 <5754B61F.6070204@riseup.net>
 <ce2f10f9-172a-cd06-1088-356215d40edb@cajuntechie.org>
 <5754BA01.9090300@riseup.net>
 <a9cbf2d2-6b5c-cd66-f587-75209d53bd26@cajuntechie.org>
Message-ID: <6082f3132b63fdeaf3f637de8e6f9582@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [OFF-LIST] Re: Has anyone HEARD from IOError since
 his last tweet?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-06-05 19:50, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 6/5/2016 6:47 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>> On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfriendly@riseup.net wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last
>>>>>> time IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
>>>>>> actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember
>>>>>> that Jake comes from a really fucked up childhood.
>>>>>> Something like these allegations could push someone over
>>>>>> the edge.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anthony
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> He might need time to himself for now. He has a lot of
>>>>>> people talking about him right now. He probably needs a
>>>>>> break.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're probably right. I've just seen this kind of thing get
>>>>> out of hand before and, innocent or not, people can be pushed
>>>>> over the edge.
>>> 
>>>> I get where you're coming from, but public comments about his
>>>> history, and speculation about suicide, really aren't
>>>> appropriate. IMHO, anyway.
>>> 
>>>> Just sayin'.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Showing concern is completely appropriate. And why not discuss
>>> his history? It's not like he hides it or even tries to. He's
>>> very open about it. I'm not saying anything Jake hasn't publicly
>>> said himself, usually in front of a few hundred people. Sorry,
>>> concern for a fellow human being trumps 'appropriateness' IMO.
>> 
>> I'm fine with concern. But on a mail list, it's creepy. But then,
>> I don't know him. And I'm pretty old-school about privacy.
> 
> Yes, I can agree it's kind of creepy. The only reason I sent it down
> the list was because I don't know specific people who know him that I
> could email privately. Otherwise, I definitely would have preferred
> that. But, surprisingly, I'm pretty OK with being creepy lol
> 
>> I did, however, screw up by sending my own "[OFF-LIST]" message to
>> the list ;)
> 
> That threw me for a second! I saw the off-list designation and then
> thought 'oh crap, I just violated his privacy by responding to a
> private email on the list'. THen I saw it had been sent to the list. I
> should have paid more attention as well and readdressed it. Sorry
> about that!
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVLqrAAoJEAKK33RTsEsVhCwQAK9azFiK6fluTTPW0pppDxAl
> g+NtoThYMeZbKpogHHa5/fkZEH/IxbWCowadLvik+cjP+X+cig2fz6yjQug8yaxc
> 1SyEXVcAhcqBpj5sVI/CZ9SP80akQD4cEMeYLvqQ0i9SoGDLIofoE9bNOFzka5S8
> 43XEMDU5CoI32hahuA+B7upae4Ka1yOiKoPUj2bKfScQ/PNqnTIHKsD/yWW4v1Zj
> GXfwiGx7M3m2SFLF3Hy74Xnpcl2QwLjzx0BmLzeVleliouO/xtyclvjpPHNXfu2b
> Z5WsXy8Q2yR+4HqlQDVV8jCKcGP3uTn4aNXiqtu1AqVH1qBhcyVelCS/lmZChQ/N
> NK2K3GR91c7/XY1Z1/WuK5pyr46d/x7+HhgRe59PpNM1GyL6Dm4tyj/BvPGfLQIM
> P+jAAOskmL8MNJKqGjGzfSqyw9I+0oDBW+NSpbNxP2btS2R1WMvtQ7L0OTEkKRf8
> 7tvu+C1S/k/S8j/67Dqyls5Q+dlmzTrHhoFjJfm714I1oXekKoWHVuHyEMdr3znK
> cq7Ir9Sl7iQprgoRah3eKEi2aUY8lZ+LRYvbOH7EFmC+FeY9I48I6n0nbhDRLWEy
> AklvQFeZWVVxNJF1UF/fthMTuxjOF5wUQ0vADN2/wNb+6EbgaKE4XpHzz+Jaf7cH
> h+mWNYiccmj68Vwdhpep
> =agD7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

It's fine. If it wasn't for the fact emails are publicly archived then 
the fact that I delete emails immediately after responding to them would 
be enough to protect his privacy.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

