Delivery-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:41:32 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0901E007D;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 21:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F42E1239;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97516E1158
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id S-eKm5JNN6bM for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DFAE107F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E814C1A1BE3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 01:41:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465177278; bh=HzNTuRXFUwfep3ySRS1pe3kpbTK9X+OpH0FhuGlJtGw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=NlM64eG3x0TVeL2Fg2ziCiKO8viebtRMUKQIIaUqWTwyM30qk63xyeNZHaUN7rGns
 MjYletVBKMxajWN5i0NTuTPf4erdvl7E4KwFHYM2mVi8y5gHWaMbfdaLRb/IoPtbdL
 IY7WgB4pMVjPraUVCTG/BAh42YhSAGC1tY8Xm/wc=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: notfriendly) with ESMTPSA id D09F6401A8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:41:18 -0400
From: notfriendly@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <c512ba8d-21f5-e1ce-4611-a999824abaf6@cajuntechie.org>
References: <51c9eb8d-bcfc-cce0-02b8-18c4c544a7de@cajuntechie.org>
 <dc9f4b61575bb70ece1a2b94449910c8@riseup.net>
 <1ae5122a-7654-28e2-1481-65648a7816de@cajuntechie.org>
 <5754B61F.6070204@riseup.net> <77a33e5205fc5e32d325bc6ba4c7f1b4@riseup.net>
 <c512ba8d-21f5-e1ce-4611-a999824abaf6@cajuntechie.org>
Message-ID: <89d90956381d7ad31df1e55588d369a1@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [OFF-LIST] Re: Has anyone HEARD from IOError since
 his last tweet?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-06-05 19:41, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 6/5/2016 6:35 PM, notfriendly@riseup.net wrote:
>> On 2016-06-05 19:30, Mirimir wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfriendly@riseup.net wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time
>>>>> IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
>>>>> actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember that
>>>>> Jake comes from a really fucked up childhood. Something like
>>>>> these allegations could push someone over the edge.
>>>> 
>>>>> Anthony
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> He might need time to himself for now. He has a lot of
>>>>> people talking about him right now. He probably needs a
>>>>> break.
>>>> 
>>>> You're probably right. I've just seen this kind of thing get
>>>> out of hand before and, innocent or not, people can be pushed
>>>> over the edge.
>>> 
>>> I get where you're coming from, but public comments about his
>>> history, and speculation about suicide, really aren't
>>> appropriate. IMHO, anyway.
>>> 
>>> Just sayin'.
>> I agree with that. We shouldn't assume someone died just because
>> they are not responding to online communications. The speculation
>> is suicide as you said is indefinably inappropriate. He might need
>> a break. Another possibility is that he is in an area with a power
>> or internet outage (I'm not sure why long term but still). These
>> are all possibilities.
> 
> I'm pretty sure I never said he had suicided so there's no
> 'assumption' there. What I did say is that, in light of the stress
> he's under, someone should at least check on him. I mean yes there are
> other possibilities but nothing should be flippantly ruled out. At
> what point is it 'appropriate' to be concerned? A month? A year?
> Never? If we never hear from him again should we simply assume he's
> alright and just decided to check out of the community? I guess we're
> all allowed our opinions but I choose to err on the side of concern
> for a fellow human being who's directly impacted my life. Your choices
> might be different.
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVLiwAAoJEAKK33RTsEsV+gkP/RFuj5jFnglZ/FAAsmrZPjqR
> oqDoWbr8axbhw1m7TkI1uGN+YGgLLuK+VsSCtPlQn+J9KN8pj38SvpVzIPA/1Dke
> snPdyA59BkE95oN5dkRmzuDT0y9yujgKXOBn/h33pfyRV259lGseJLDzf6y5IcCq
> 7pSWeoDEBnWqt0LjdLODOQrRCti1Vdiu32tNf5vUQRgX4r1bNvMUPu/xTDcR6/K9
> m2zf56ejIgDuiu6wXb1Hu+9Vi5p27UWibt4NvExpxBTCbF9ajbpI4EZtKQi81R1B
> JzsNHQS5O2Mg9daCuOYgf0pLXbuhozDeXdoH4mmwTZvkOqoBv843hJl8SrXnZZPK
> B6i7kQ0wx0dTMUpbacN3oNLYSaBDdXgDe3HqxRBqWXhTcCEMP0LMzQJ8TEljuYOv
> 6c3ZMnrOh6hMm1h5ScWSK/MGTil7392PPzt8/MdGWTjwGTq2X+KXhIjfsT6qQ9rz
> fg/QgBBNaRFCYLKzEWV+k9JHU8SyFEoI5VK89W39K+sZeemFmTcyOwTFnGPyeBIi
> mO7udvZiFyeBoc0r4mYAMh16mcP1JycaG5WSYvA5KlwuUqVWljpyXHp4ib3Og28B
> z/cidAxOpaC9jBjZqvmqXbfi3dzzPWd7DWOKsI9k0BPMtWyUuReVutrDnbye/SOk
> tGeDevtxHSsxgibhq7MI
> =akKt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"I'm pretty sure I never said he had suicided so there's no
'assumption' there."

Ok sorry for making that error in my reading of your messages. I do 
however say that we should respect his privacy by not having people 
harass him at his apartment.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

