Delivery-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:50:45 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD9B1E07E8;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 19:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFB7E10A0;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:50:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0321DE1092
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id CI2QY9TCP55X for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:50:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from forward19h.cmail.yandex.net (forward19h.cmail.yandex.net
 [87.250.230.161])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA494E1086
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:50:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (smtp1h.mail.yandex.net
 [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::115])
 by forward19h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1E100211CB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 02:50:02 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C96001340407
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 02:50:02 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id
 MleMk5smBE-o1nGvulv; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 02:50:01 +0300
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client certificate not present)
X-Yandex-ForeignMX: DE
X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <51c9eb8d-bcfc-cce0-02b8-18c4c544a7de@cajuntechie.org>
 <dc9f4b61575bb70ece1a2b94449910c8@riseup.net>
 <1ae5122a-7654-28e2-1481-65648a7816de@cajuntechie.org>
 <5754B61F.6070204@riseup.net>
 <ce2f10f9-172a-cd06-1088-356215d40edb@cajuntechie.org>
 <5754BA01.9090300@riseup.net>
From: Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org>
Openpgp: id=C5CEE687DDC2D12B906356EA028ADF7453B04B15
Message-ID: <a9cbf2d2-6b5c-cd66-f587-75209d53bd26@cajuntechie.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:50:03 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5754BA01.9090300@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [OFF-LIST] Re: Has anyone HEARD from IOError since
 his last tweet?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 6/5/2016 6:47 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>> On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfriendly@riseup.net wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last
>>>>> time IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
>>>>> actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember
>>>>> that Jake comes from a really fucked up childhood.
>>>>> Something like these allegations could push someone over
>>>>> the edge.
>>>> 
>>>>> Anthony
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> He might need time to himself for now. He has a lot of
>>>>> people talking about him right now. He probably needs a
>>>>> break.
>>>> 
>>>> You're probably right. I've just seen this kind of thing get
>>>> out of hand before and, innocent or not, people can be pushed
>>>> over the edge.
>> 
>>> I get where you're coming from, but public comments about his 
>>> history, and speculation about suicide, really aren't
>>> appropriate. IMHO, anyway.
>> 
>>> Just sayin'.
>> 
>> 
>> Showing concern is completely appropriate. And why not discuss
>> his history? It's not like he hides it or even tries to. He's
>> very open about it. I'm not saying anything Jake hasn't publicly
>> said himself, usually in front of a few hundred people. Sorry,
>> concern for a fellow human being trumps 'appropriateness' IMO.
> 
> I'm fine with concern. But on a mail list, it's creepy. But then,
> I don't know him. And I'm pretty old-school about privacy.

Yes, I can agree it's kind of creepy. The only reason I sent it down
the list was because I don't know specific people who know him that I
could email privately. Otherwise, I definitely would have preferred
that. But, surprisingly, I'm pretty OK with being creepy lol

> I did, however, screw up by sending my own "[OFF-LIST]" message to
> the list ;)

That threw me for a second! I saw the off-list designation and then
thought 'oh crap, I just violated his privacy by responding to a
private email on the list'. THen I saw it had been sent to the list. I
should have paid more attention as well and readdressed it. Sorry
about that!



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=agD7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

