Delivery-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:35:24 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_URI_ONLY,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEBFC1E0080;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 19:35:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669A9E0F72;
	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:35:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FE3E0F56
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id IPl8oBhXEzdQ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96254E0F44
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7347E1A58DC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2016 23:35:11 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1465169711; bh=ZLIr/XEx8x0MqExRmUlG166WwT390i+f1Sah3ch8zDw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=nHqZEE3b33df5eJCB4U/GftBlm0di5Nj/2FjnS4LAEkEyTY72qCH+aktQfLtqMFPB
 IXH1gbMILpNDY+tall16gtF24htCSfT24gUYvP096HKjCAJurreYwimzT/1MH4Yztu
 GkcLQtk/+f8IRCB332JWTOcgXO7hBLMs1yr7R+Wo=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: notfriendly) with ESMTPSA id 58921401A8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:35:11 -0400
From: notfriendly@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <5754B61F.6070204@riseup.net>
References: <51c9eb8d-bcfc-cce0-02b8-18c4c544a7de@cajuntechie.org>
 <dc9f4b61575bb70ece1a2b94449910c8@riseup.net>
 <1ae5122a-7654-28e2-1481-65648a7816de@cajuntechie.org>
 <5754B61F.6070204@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <77a33e5205fc5e32d325bc6ba4c7f1b4@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [OFF-LIST] Re: Has anyone HEARD from IOError since
 his last tweet?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-06-05 19:30, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfriendly@riseup.net wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time IOError
>>> tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list actually HEARD from
>>> him since then? We have to remember that Jake comes from a really
>>> fucked up childhood. Something like these allegations could push
>>> someone over the edge.
>> 
>>> Anthony
>> 
>> 
>>> He might need time to himself for now. He has a lot of people
>>> talking about him right now. He probably needs a break.
>> 
>> You're probably right. I've just seen this kind of thing get out of
>> hand before and, innocent or not, people can be pushed over the edge.
> 
> I get where you're coming from, but public comments about his history,
> and speculation about suicide, really aren't appropriate. IMHO, anyway.
> 
> Just sayin'.
I agree with that. We shouldn't assume someone died just because they 
are not responding to online communications. The speculation is suicide 
as you said is indefinably inappropriate. He might need a break. Another 
possibility is that he is in an area with a power or internet outage 
(I'm not sure why long term but still). These are all possibilities.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

