Delivery-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:00:48 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE4B01E067B;
	Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:00:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A75235BBF;
	Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:00:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70763353F1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:00:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id u2mJPxfG8L10 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:00:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2907E35335
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:00:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so38973265wig.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=QGIHaZHFqqw0HZI6akvHythetnk2wiBHhCjvFztWTCU=;
 b=ct7qwZ5JFbD4/urffIk1NO6NT4JUBfZTmV2W2Mt5Va/qcQYbkn6eOhCkydK8J6pJw3
 0gfy2k5WWosFfdkVgFIbSJ5CzszOUy0kxnONKqKJfmqWLiEY7n4oEDdMEOwpB3wFpbEK
 N+ina8PN3OWX7Z7S3xcnxAQgTIRCN7Zbj6MMTskUYJ3iCHDZLC06QoxEKF/rDtNwVTRz
 KiHii4Z1YdNgaaBUEVqLJKLuXIUFHVO3dERfdAyLS6fRr/6vfHzr9YnZtW+i5H8ZmUJz
 kFTTJgA9lEa4/t8Af5dFihx6Dc0Pe4flRSWIpoUl75cNL2FEYPgz/174iOHGbqpn8293
 XBIA==
X-Received: by 10.194.188.107 with SMTP id fz11mr34714423wjc.98.1434207630274; 
 Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8108:8100:3814:6cb6:8673:f07f:f4e4?
 ([2a02:8108:8100:3814:6cb6:8673:f07f:f4e4])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v3sm1397785wja.31.2015.06.13.08.00.28
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: aka <akademiker1@googlemail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: aka <akademiker1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <557C4579.7000802@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:00:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <1811622581ef82fda947a8e82f54169f.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
In-Reply-To: <1811622581ef82fda947a8e82f54169f.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] What's better than Tor for criminals?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Proxies on infected machines. "Better" means higher success when
conducting criminal activities: purchases will less likely be marked as
fraud, IPS will less likely block a connection. It's not more anonymous,
just more useful for criminal activities.

torlove@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> Hello...
> 
> I'm an avid tor lover and user.
> 
> I'm trying to understand a statement I've heard a number of people on the
> Tor team and in the Tor community repeat over the years and was wondering
> if it could be explained.
> 
> The statement: Paraphrasing, it's been said several times, by Roger, etc,
> that...
> 
> "Criminals have much better options available to them than Tor for strong
> internet anonymity."
> 
> I'm trying to understand what these options are and why don't we
> non-criminal tech savvy people have some of these better options?
> 
> Is this just talking about the option of using encrypted botnets, or are
> there other additional options that criminals use?
> 
> What are these criminal anonymity methods that are stronger than Tor?
> 
> Thanks all!
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

