Delivery-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:40:43 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759811E03B0;
	Sat,  6 Jun 2015 21:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E5C356D5;
	Sun,  7 Jun 2015 01:40:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7843546F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  7 Jun 2015 01:40:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Ir0K59EkUG2A for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  7 Jun 2015 01:40:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5534935467
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  7 Jun 2015 01:40:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FCD41B63
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  7 Jun 2015 01:40:28 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1433641228; bh=hj/t05rF3c8/X3RVQPpSpfQ/5UQ8zd24bIwAygV8/jU=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=NVJwmdVBP7N/bQ0aGAnObNYEVpdYKBsa5Ai+x6YSWbHq6DWPjWIV/PXaE6ItzoXnw
 1iNpIpdp16yW2YzaG02OlhM9og1JJBc7H4wp5RCxYFb3QQap4nOddVnQDlpNy04NNW
 M1kLO4A9Iv6QbjGAV/dXWSMSrTzOiPWsASzOhkCI=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id 0E3BB20145
Message-ID: <5573A10B.6040208@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 19:40:27 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <1811622581ef82fda947a8e82f54169f.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
 <CAKrUFkjxO7kerUO-AUELW9kBLUKtS4kNBY5uSAtsw4hRmC+s6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+=uuLi7bvCpAPKm5KHgeixjTKXC+wSpNYdMD01pepg9rsieg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH+=uuLi7bvCpAPKm5KHgeixjTKXC+wSpNYdMD01pepg9rsieg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] What's better than Tor for criminals?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 06/06/2015 02:20 PM, Charlie Belmer wrote:
> I always took it to mean using malware infected hosts, rootkits, and C&C
> servers to do the dirty work, which not only makes you hard to trace, but
> can also point investigations at the infected host.

Or Hola Premium ;)

> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Max Bond <max.o.bond@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Organized criminals will probably achieve better operational security by
>> conducting themselves in the real world as much as possible. This is not an
>> option available to a lone dissident in an oppressed country.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 11:50 AM, <torlove@ruggedinbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello...
>>>
>>> I'm an avid tor lover and user.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand a statement I've heard a number of people on the
>>> Tor team and in the Tor community repeat over the years and was wondering
>>> if it could be explained.
>>>
>>> The statement: Paraphrasing, it's been said several times, by Roger, etc,
>>> that...
>>>
>>> "Criminals have much better options available to them than Tor for strong
>>> internet anonymity."
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand what these options are and why don't we
>>> non-criminal tech savvy people have some of these better options?
>>>
>>> Is this just talking about the option of using encrypted botnets, or are
>>> there other additional options that criminals use?
>>>
>>> What are these criminal anonymity methods that are stronger than Tor?
>>>
>>> Thanks all!
>>>
>>> --
>>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>>
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

