Delivery-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 16:16:32 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57091E03CF;
	Sat,  6 Jun 2015 16:16:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4635C8B;
	Sat,  6 Jun 2015 20:16:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C94135C8A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  6 Jun 2015 20:16:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id I4ClaOrudnhk for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  6 Jun 2015 20:16:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ACA35C89
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  6 Jun 2015 20:16:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so48269425wib.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=/RXrISiTv0cFkJNEv1CYHm1QJZOX71OK5ioqGUHmXnc=;
 b=LmakznYGYO95y3rWgMi25zF25e0Hre/f5sUmspxz9GE1oEI0pn2axoWGswy8KV6H1i
 5yEiLISn09KwIaNSs++2gW9n9Zn8TCDjDpYidtDYObx3C+sFTMpY0pjp2Mawsik8GwFm
 P6yULGMZQZluTrqIrSGX19E3ky3iC7u9gXiZKhQGgottqKrmsL+5pbE1EFDtRwvQSLpW
 TgX58S9Fu1+Tw5qqLYJERxEPghQ70FwkLhbKCJxmoDdO4R0f9eT3FBoaKFoyr5A0lzAK
 DMmKWqGu5GxN4lCh6990hC7/3alMLxVzHZB+kWyoBKWKXRRODHhttDArbV6b1SgMpq5M
 oIfw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr7780069wic.47.1433621778446;
 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.160.13 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 13:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1811622581ef82fda947a8e82f54169f.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
References: <1811622581ef82fda947a8e82f54169f.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:16:18 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKrUFkjxO7kerUO-AUELW9kBLUKtS4kNBY5uSAtsw4hRmC+s6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Max Bond <max.o.bond@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] What's better than Tor for criminals?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Organized criminals will probably achieve better operational security by
conducting themselves in the real world as much as possible. This is not an
option available to a lone dissident in an oppressed country.

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 11:50 AM, <torlove@ruggedinbox.com> wrote:

> Hello...
>
> I'm an avid tor lover and user.
>
> I'm trying to understand a statement I've heard a number of people on the
> Tor team and in the Tor community repeat over the years and was wondering
> if it could be explained.
>
> The statement: Paraphrasing, it's been said several times, by Roger, etc,
> that...
>
> "Criminals have much better options available to them than Tor for strong
> internet anonymity."
>
> I'm trying to understand what these options are and why don't we
> non-criminal tech savvy people have some of these better options?
>
> Is this just talking about the option of using encrypted botnets, or are
> there other additional options that criminals use?
>
> What are these criminal anonymity methods that are stronger than Tor?
>
> Thanks all!
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

