Delivery-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 08:15:21 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF971E0407;
	Fri,  5 Jun 2015 08:15:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92C435945;
	Fri,  5 Jun 2015 12:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67CD3579D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2015 12:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id yHZ_Hv2uVpT4 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  5 Jun 2015 12:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp17.openmailbox.org (smtp17.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.51])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF0F353EA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2015 12:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28292E0093
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2015 14:15:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t=1433506502; bh=
 hy5rHG3HZ4eIOJEwh2CGXIr+MyK8hAqHkLXetyy9bX0=; b=uzObhFehwceGOJxq
 x9c8YbRnJOI7o9iEeIph/d0P/YOvVkbDiCClQMCXjGn1uGWxzCvpvtn6xj8kajUd
 7YB4fwAkrsuMlITSGrI4/Qz0mWWqH/2BW4uNlexSjmRgz6sfb+v8zzDR33jDLi3c
 WRADdyrnqKtfSvkaE3Bp0HUsPqI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id u7LuVcoRLdxf for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  5 Jun 2015 14:15:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <557192C0.7060004@openmailbox.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 12:14:56 +0000
From: nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <556F707A.6050506@openmailbox.org> <5570269C.2040702@donncha.is>
 <55702AC7.1040608@openmailbox.org> <20150605091045.GA1687@nymity.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20150605091045.GA1687@nymity.ch>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] DocTor's 'Possible Sybil Attack' (2015-06-03) report
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>> Again, I really dislike the in-transparency here.
> 
> I agree that it needs improvement.  In theory, we already have a
> public repository for blacklisting relays: 
> <https://gitweb.torproject.org/authdirbadexit.git/>
> 
> In practice, nobody has had time yet to put all existing rules in
> the new repository.

Yes, it appears empty..


How have they been excluded? (specific IPs, entire IP blocks,
fingerprints, ...)


>> Why have they been excluded?
> 
> I attached a list of fingerprints that were rejected by the
> directory authorities around May 20.

list based on your fingerprints:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/2015-05-20_102HSDirs_rejected.txt

They did not even bother to change IPs, ORport or nicknames.

> All these relays were HSDirs and actively scanned hidden services
> they were responsible for.

What does 'scanned' mean in this context? TCP SYN scans or more tor
specific like 'relay early' attacks (something that came up again when
I saw they all run tor 0.2.4.x).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2a8z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

