Delivery-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 06:39:26 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA6C1E0BD4;
	Thu,  4 Jun 2015 06:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C743D35B55;
	Thu,  4 Jun 2015 10:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D21435B53
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 10:39:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id tEDHpDpyYgX0 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  4 Jun 2015 10:39:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp1.openmailbox.org (smtp1.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.35])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4AB635ACF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 10:39:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCE6200653
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 12:39:12 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t=1433414350; bh=
 qYneRtFzB73ozKaNr2ej55A5nVCo8K2dp/JK+wPKTDw=; b=sJv0O1JdW8oIl7pB
 zCZYy3OV4D90V+A8IlkcKXNugxySc90vzy1VIV/pghwzJdMWYrzq6uupoYRHygZI
 p6q1w+JSb8IESxLgYpOZfHk2PUA4HDewsAHGoJ0heQwoWFtgfRR+smr/KNKoYR8u
 ZUx3Jfe4wmAv3Swur1/OpBykhyI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id Iz0t2fxXChgn for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  4 Jun 2015 12:39:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55702AC7.1040608@openmailbox.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:39:03 +0000
From: nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <556F707A.6050506@openmailbox.org> <5570269C.2040702@donncha.is>
In-Reply-To: <5570269C.2040702@donncha.is>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] DocTor's 'Possible Sybil Attack' (2015-06-03) report
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> These relays have previously been excluded from the Tor network.
> They have now tried rejoining with new fingerprints. All of the
> following relays are confirmed as being managed by the same
> operator.

Again, I really dislike the in-transparency here.

Could you share a bit more information?
(or if it is already available somewhere, a url is enough)

Which relays where excluded? (identified by fingerprints)
When were they excluded?
How have they been excluded? (specific IPs, entire IP blocks,
fingerprints, ...)
Why have they been excluded?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ltgX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

