Delivery-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 13:18:38 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEFE91E0A41;
	Sat, 27 Jun 2015 13:18:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AF636184;
	Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E41536100
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id COD-3_798meY for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57868360FF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A739641D53
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:18:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: phw)
 with ESMTPSA id 55291203FF
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 13:18:24 -0400
From: Philipp Winter <phw@nymity.ch>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20150627171824.GB6938@nymity.ch>
Mail-Followup-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAPkfgVYZRxja1b8DWe7jRfahjZV9F627U__Biw60oA3oh_6tjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <558D3B49.1050704@openmailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <558D3B49.1050704@openmailbox.org>
X-PGP-Fpr: B369 E7A2 18FE CEAD EB96  8C73 CF70 89E3 D7FD C0D0
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] A month with BADONIONS
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:45:13PM +0200, nusenu wrote:
> @phw: did the dir authorities blacklist
> 09A880567B0839B4085C2EC14002DE34AAFE8548 or did it disappear on its
> own? (downtime 4 days)

The relay wasn't blacklisted and disappeared on its own.

Chloe is right in saying that the BadExit process could work better.
Similar to so many other projects, there are not enough people to keep
up with all the work.  The little resources we have we tend to spend on
more serious attacks.  That is not to say that traffic sniffing is
harmless, but we are forced to prioritise.

Cheers,
Philipp
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

