Delivery-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:17:54 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 770101E0BD0;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D27936D5C;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712A836D50
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id OE3GG04Q-6eb for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5174136408
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:17:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ykdt186 with SMTP id t186so68492763ykd.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=5QPHo6ehH9p8KE22El7RaoC+wN5ZvhPAGFnOUPwFo7I=;
 b=tKNlF5DcHCwBMBPw2a9OLdvf0uYfdzfQ4WKNR9+3rvBmDjK/7btlQ2G4qJa+osvMHf
 ujWqI9HqwvLztWa1devPHU42+3vFmfAzsMVNHNq8Sht1zmc4IPQkQibJcjmxxya1xjhm
 6m27sbtB9ns6e6JMkCL/icAFAvwUt2lUJ5PfYoeMbPhkguZcLSJucO68USZ+SZHamhBZ
 CvAt5PeHyGEeIZLTci0c24fRT4XUJWVvygMpuXgNjvzCkNsM+N66kHHFJ9dUG9qYWhIP
 RsSDFLyBNY0fMnZDMFyI5o7onLV9rqTnfpF+4FA6DgcATm0tuY0OzVSQDKu2BtireohZ
 lTuA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.119.147 with SMTP id l141mr4221724ykb.89.1435349857939; 
 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.35.3 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.35.3 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:17:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJwFvsUhDbo60X9MrXRe-iKpbU4zz-8Q7W9er-+G2yk_DDS+fA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tyler Hardin <th020394@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [tor-talk] Clear net and Tor site on the same server
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Why is it suggested not to do this? Does it matter as long as I'm not at
all concerned about privacy? I want to run a wallet-less bitcoin node and
thought I might as well make it accessible via Tor, however it definitely
isn't worth paying for an extra server to serve as a dedicated proxy.

BTW, what kind of memory usage can I get by with to run a Tor server? How
about a Tor node?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

