Delivery-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:41:27 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B66C1E0BC3
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:41:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749672F3CD;
	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:41:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDA72F89B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id jJ7FKWKiH6SC for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486EB29DC1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u10so850326lbd.10
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=IJiS+GXy7MoF10Koj4d1vhqZgeklztrPUrTII9h7oT4=;
 b=MKL78bhroHVmbEKeb6fP3/usamnbjvr7ZwMfWOB+BgtKEBkcKpetYCG5Mk03a2t1QI
 wV4OXLdFfdXSkPXz7sfqhFZK9oXyAiJyvZesOjZs8HLt9ZGpbZFimFvn3sGAwJT1plHq
 8VFym+XuG++jwA9CyV1omF4KWURDyKSEv/H481bwjDQmCMojyWVFpd0DaRzScXzKXZIv
 2Drdv+KQLiaqwqRfXDm8V23sL/yWe4LJTtgM5dW+iuQhc2ogjEbK7mgCFIyptrvo3zdr
 vrcsD+FGPev/HbYaDmhy8vieeovDfpo5so2qHBXGeeRN7JZp8X1PQoVr4RXECjvbOFqj
 PepA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.43.98 with SMTP id v2mr1787945lal.83.1402428424452; Tue,
 10 Jun 2014 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.162.104 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKkunMZHYdKvbFZ9n0uqvmCPL68ZpV_y=gADVDzhHumYUQ4z-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALTuW+F1SU7OLfOvua0w8WpkSZm0uQyzg971U3pePqrCTenA8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKkunMZHYdKvbFZ9n0uqvmCPL68ZpV_y=gADVDzhHumYUQ4z-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:27:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CALTuW+G7ETyAbVEUTfvie0Tez_qe6pNzj1phCo7yE+FqFkRw1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Antonio Z <adbeiler4444@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Ad Blocking Software
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I did not think that Adblock was trustable considering how an
extension can bypass Tor.

On 6/10/14, Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z <adbeiler4444@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your
>> own ad blocking software would bring more people to tor. It does not
>> even have to come with the bundle. It could just be an optional add on
>> called, Tor Ad blocker.
>>
>> Inappropriate ads are the main reason why I would just shift back to a
>> browser in which I can maneuver easier.
>
> What's wrong with any of the ad blockers already out there, like, adblock?
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

