Delivery-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:26:14 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F251E0C6B
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 19:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E582037A;
	Sun,  1 Jun 2014 23:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB77126E70
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 23:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id EjAPc9ocrpd2 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  1 Jun 2014 23:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6C52247D5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 23:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fruiteater.riseup.net (fruiteater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.74])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F08540FC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 16:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir@fruiteater.riseup.net)
 with ESMTPSA id 08C40DC4
Message-ID: <538BB310.3040407@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 17:11:12 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAD2Ti29i-Rh=80edAs2KQaufj-+5HoKp+mzCxKNsWkY2fRo7KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ABEE0A39-7920-4D94-91C1-91CF687531CC@michaeldupree.net>
 <CAD2Ti2_p1t8CJCv1Q9OgNMUWto3a_qyc9AMkyhHhX-3Ud5tMGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2_p1t8CJCv1Q9OgNMUWto3a_qyc9AMkyhHhX-3Ud5tMGw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Craigslist now giving Tor the slows, lol
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 06/01/2014 01:46 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Michael Dupree Jr.
> <michael@michaeldupree.net> wrote:
>> Seems to be about normal(slow tor) speed for me.
> 
> I should try to work on some tools to test against sites people
> report as blocking tor, since as in your note re: this one,
> often other people say it 'works for them'. To be fair,
> it could be higher exit probabilities resulting in abuse
> blocking for those nodes. Or other such things that
> could be checked.

Here's a crude hack:

Craigslist_test.sh
...............................................................
#!/bin/bash

run=1
while [ $run -le N ]
## where N is approximately the run time (hours) ##
do
   echo "run $run starting at `date +%F_%H-%M`"
   for CLURL in $(cat ~/Craigslist_URLs)
   ## don't include "http://" in URLs ##
   do
      NOW=`date +%F_%H-%M`
      echo "   dump IP Chicken at $NOW"
      links2 -g -dump http://ipchicken.com/ > ~/dumps/IP-$NOW &
      NOW=`date +%F_%H-%M`
      echo "   dump Craigslist URL http://$CLURL at $NOW"
      links2 -g -dump http://$CLURL > ~/dumps/$CLURL-$NOW &
      sleep $[($RANDOM % 5)+5]m
   done
   sleep $[($RANDOM % 60)+30]m
   let "run+=1"
done
exit 0
...............................................................

Craigslist_URLs
.......................
berlin.de.craigslist.de
...
.......................
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

