Delivery-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:56:47 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421C91E08C9
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:56:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7E0212A1;
	Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A995A212A1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Ir8wBLkQmsdA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8485320DB4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w7so5818371qcr.21
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=X2H1+7HYolARz5/JfEoq1zlaN2qNYiFSE7zKuatou5g=;
 b=i74otXf6wR2ag7nJQ1TL9JKvFzqrqjHO8mI3bgj9/lJrGE/B6Oq+cFiQIU1Pd+kT34
 vFSYc/NfhE0iDEzHXOTHQNoNASMQzchZEFpf9eAR/BGB4eor446xL7Y+QdXs0agvonKA
 Kd9lyUk16NOlHsd/1sO4u0j+YKCee6Q6QwacMwaQgasCOCCl/lguHSSxP8qMHpgf52FK
 l5M1eanm/iOWpljfq9VobO8D++6N96hvpqOs9jN4FORRKi2ba417EI53aP8iFgo0lt7t
 BrrG7h3dNj7n9OHTxRXAGdJ13eUzK3QIBNuF4rZ/tqw8o5qzZ2dGzaTdHhRHCDSVTg3Q
 MIjw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.137.9 with SMTP id u9mr38588032qat.24.1404014015180;
 Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.179.232 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53AEC2F9.6080701@gmx.com>
References: <53ADB7A6.7080709@gmx.com> <20140628095417.GA7408@moria.seul.org>
 <53AEC2F9.6080701@gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:53:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJVRA1T_MYt2L43ascUqGcAX_kHT0v7r3YLNZ2ba-+kWuhiQUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] hardware acceleration OK or not?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com> wrote:
> ...
> I've had no TB crashes in Windows, but I'm also not sure there's any
> performance increase for typical internet usage in TB, whether hardware
> acceleration is / is not enabled.


it makes a difference for high performance relays. client don't notice
unless you're on mobile or embedded.

in theory you're also closing a few side channels ... ;)


if you are not crashing, i would leave it enabled.


best regards,
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

