Delivery-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:42:17 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384971E0AFC
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B0E2E4AB;
	Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:42:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8342B2D776
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 81kFE8vcS7hu for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB252D704
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 131so3121507ykp.11
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=G/lvOiq2LD3IrT0D/QLuh2hCTNUZIqiG5ZkFPTdklK8=;
 b=hsAEq4ikGlI6U8q/fW3NN1kg4McPDhfbn/NZdCbJ2q90xKK2KEFnEaaJ8fUZe5xW7I
 XBp4U30fxNzAX2JaS8JaOKoYc6wKPVWD8r+OZyh/WhJ9NMLG2sAIUXcAqTaS8H+t3rhE
 /6F3vJzjP604BbOwlFWcNvjPg4r8nAlV7pcJJbja+T2MKCcoOs/wImnCy/xUd3PlxXMY
 YbrKPuooHcMYJruk1iYoM0PHAhSnbax5u47wYiNR2WPIm1xqxwPnbe1N9KoVQnGlDGrw
 8vVOlhYPtukmkFL+/aKBQGM/cHFgHvGQVIWWUAGzk7ydXdlA3uLycvoSgfj4Q3GwmTBy
 LqyQ==
X-Received: by 10.236.181.42 with SMTP id k30mr34848624yhm.112.1403894074833; 
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown ([64.76.4.192])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm5102785yhg.18.2014.06.27.11.34.32
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:38:01 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20140627153801.0000732c@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <DUB121-W20A3812716DFD202050E82C81B0@phx.gbl>
References: <DUB121-W32E5B8525EB5756FB0DD73C8190@phx.gbl>
 <53AB3C75.4020105@gmx.com>
 <DUB121-W401DDF2EB0B4F36357ADA2C8190@phx.gbl>
 <53AB742E.5000400@riseup.net>
 <DUB121-W1602424B2673FF14097129C8180@phx.gbl>
 <53ABAAFA.1040406@riseup.net>
 <CAJVRA1Tydi5nB544ggjZM2BvPXC=zGr_8AReO0qP_pxQ3me4UA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD2Ti2_F_Zbt8uL5s=hNXaNapnof2KSOPZFVgN3B-qxp5JtQqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJVRA1QzUniu3cLgqLitZR7tp4TchrqD+Ak_Os0Hrm2Oe9aScw@mail.gmail.com>
 <DUB121-W20A3812716DFD202050E82C81B0@phx.gbl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0cvs12 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
 Anonymity
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:53:46 +0100
Mark McCarron <mark.mccarron@live.co.uk> wrote:

> Well, I think this is settling down into a proper discussion.  Whilst
> the hypothesis is untested, leveraging illegal activity, especially
> reviled illegal activity, as a metric for the quality of anonymity
> and security provided by Tor is a sound strategy.
> =

> As mentioned before, the 'canary' is dead and we need to understand
> why.  =


	Easy. Tor, by design, is useless against
	governments that can do traffic analysis. For instance, the US
	government. =

	=

	Notice that this fact is mentioned in tor=B4s =B4fine print=B4 so to
	speak. Once in a while some developer would mention that
	traffic correlation is trivial if you can watch traffic in and
	out of the network. And then, it seems as if everyone forgets
	that little fact. =


	And so we have amusing tor lackeys like =A8coderman=A8
	parroting propaganda that not even the tor developers
	themselves believe. =


	So, how did the american gestapo get freedom hosting and silk
	road? Traffic analysis. =


	Also, in case that  great =B4security=B4 =B4experts=B4 such as
	coderman and other tor lackeys on this list havent been reading
	the mainstream media : =


	It is now common knowledge that the nsa gives information to
	=B4ordinary=B4 cops, and that  =B4ordinary=B4 cops then pretend =

	they got the information doing =B4police work=B4

	=

	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction




J.


	=





	=


	=




Given that this is a global phenomenon, then we need to examine
> the factors that effect this group.  The primary factor would be the
> software itself.  A secondary factor would be the law, but this is
> not a consistent factor across the world.
> =

> What other consistent factors are there?
> =

> Regards,
> =

> Mark McCarron
>  		 	   		  =


-- =

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

