Delivery-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:11:58 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98991E0D98
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874482F6D7;
	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306D32F636
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id KxmBjhN-apRR for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6692F3FE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k15so2399735qaq.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=VplpLN1Nxp8J8iR2jsKD4OZttIjn09tRJIyzyq2WsHA=;
 b=aSbLvTJekA2DHEKvhrxkp9YlVUEBPbepgbkYm9a1l8JOqKwrwGX1WQIL1oU08CPxGG
 POSpVdCB4oDTC1azPsem0G7Sgt/i9F1LW1H4OfR5fh83v4QIfZRE1gGymCM3Ur49FkHh
 DGMFK96whyRGabpXy56KAaM5eYQUyeg44vfPnpTyudQxBpM/JjLzpwOsxrLsoSAOUFQC
 HEXtHkjDSzwe47ZTNYqhOEFFfi5+DxkwnTZBYFLwX/q+6pH8LH9FaHrmLqbjLXtAcYN0
 jPrfMKr3Q9vskfMgMvr1nt43qQzoFAUVNOaffD11Yb3HNcn/rI/2canPV5s9Nod/7POQ
 DdHA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.19.207 with SMTP id 73mr18044814qgh.46.1403762436268;
 Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.179.232 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53ABAAFA.1040406@riseup.net>
References: <DUB121-W32E5B8525EB5756FB0DD73C8190@phx.gbl>
 <53AB3C75.4020105@gmx.com>
 <DUB121-W401DDF2EB0B4F36357ADA2C8190@phx.gbl>
 <53AB742E.5000400@riseup.net>
 <DUB121-W1602424B2673FF14097129C8180@phx.gbl>
 <53ABAAFA.1040406@riseup.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJVRA1Tydi5nB544ggjZM2BvPXC=zGr_8AReO0qP_pxQ3me4UA@mail.gmail.com>
From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
	Anonymity
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
> ...
> As far as I know, no hidden service site has ever been compromised
> through an inherent weakness of Tor. Am I wrong in saying that?


i am only aware of one Tor vulnerability that led to compromised
hidden services of affected instances, back in 2007.

also not a government or LE leveraged vuln.

the original argument is based on faulty assumptions.


best regards,
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

