Delivery-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:57:19 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C1A1E0A01
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:57:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2012FA97;
	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:57:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289FB2F9D5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id CJzKREHzcFw7 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76372F918
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:55:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n12so2593633wgh.7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dTSwbRqteCRVMUSBFuC+uSzyjwVyxo42Hi1J3N/6+n8=;
 b=cgSPyO2aJ6fnYyxKGM9nXT/vGCGEAat2QYJNjGQ9UKCHM1F7Ba2sGpJXf1IYmCLAXD
 HFs/U834a21OYr569gdhTJQJzpwiNsAjzkRCBJG6C3h1lAE+R8j4jlFc57WihJfnOOw6
 lEnG1uwec7SbYTAsL0+azKt+RU9gToeWIKhut+WyxfzGu0ZcS99lbfiU7drnJR370oH2
 //d4TqknztHvFQghWBgeQLbV1L1WgntqRaquZ5pXsLbCr9n5B9geH4xUTOOkUXeJE/kW
 1E4iLns7Tbfl8nlaZNAplRAMxGDPssb1F4nVPI6nGZkG4lnhliJpuc2sSS7pAAzHH7Xj
 KmZQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.73.66 with SMTP id j2mr8141458wiv.36.1403196925918;
 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (ANice-652-1-161-118.w83-197.abo.wanadoo.fr.
 [83.197.8.118])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oy4sm9832805wjb.41.2014.06.19.09.55.24
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53A31601.7070704@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:55:29 +0200
From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <53A30C94.1080506@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <53A30C94.1080506@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in
 TorBrowser?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

That's exactly what I pointed out in my follow-up email regarding yt =

streaming.

Given that there are no options to disable it or ask for permission in =

FF, given that FF behaviour is unclear regarding how it is managed (for =

example blocking 'offline storage' by clicking on the icon on the left =

of the url + more information/permissions seems to have no effect) and =

given that it is used by many sites to store cookie-like stuff, I really =

think it should be disabled.

I would disable the cache too since it can give some information that =

you already visited the place and when.

Le 19/06/2014 18:15, Joe Btfsplk a =E9crit :
> Curious: Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in Tor =

> Browser 3.6.x, when other forms of disk storage are disabled?
>
> If so, why is that?

-- =

Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms

-- =

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

